Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38675813›Full record

ArticleVaccines2024

Comparison of Wealth-Related Inequality in Tetanus Vaccination Coverage before and during Pregnancy: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of 72 Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Nicole E Johns, Cauane Blumenberg, Katherine Kirkby, Adrien Allorant, Francine Dos Santos Costa, M Carolina Danovaro-Holliday, Carrie Lyons, Nasir Yusuf, Aluísio J D Barros, Ahmad Reza Hosseinpoor

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicole E JohnsDepartment of Data and Analytics, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4513-4582
Cauane BlumenbergInternational Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Rua Mal Deodoro 1160, Pelotas 96020-220, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4580-3849
Katherine KirkbyDepartment of Data and Analytics, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6881-409X
Adrien AllorantDepartment of Data and Analytics, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.
Francine Dos Santos CostaInternational Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Rua Mal Deodoro 1160, Pelotas 96020-220, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9558-937X
M Carolina Danovaro-HollidayDepartment of Immunization, Vaccines, and Biologicals, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7324-9198
Carrie LyonsDepartment of Data and Analytics, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.
Nasir YusufDepartment of Immunization, Vaccines, and Biologicals, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.
Aluísio J D BarrosInternational Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Rua Mal Deodoro 1160, Pelotas 96020-220, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2022-8729
Ahmad Reza HosseinpoorDepartment of Data and Analytics, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7322-672X
World Health Organization · CHUniversidade Federal de Pelotas · BR

Funding

Gavi N/AWorld Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunization of pregnant women against tetanus is a key strategy for reducing tetanus morbidity and mortality while also achieving the goal of maternal and neonatal tetanus elimination. Despite substantial progress in improving newborn protection from tetanus at birth through maternal immunization, umbilical cord practices and sterilized and safe deliveries, inequitable gaps in protection remain. Notably, an infant's tetanus protection at birth is comprised of immunization received by the mother during and before the pregnancy (e.g., through childhood vaccination, booster doses, mass vaccination campaigns, or during prior pregnancies). In this work, we examine wealth-related inequalities in maternal tetanus toxoid containing vaccination coverage before pregnancy, during pregnancy, and at birth for 72 low- and middle-income countries with a recent Demographic and Health Survey or Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (between 2013 and 2022). We summarize coverage levels and absolute and relative inequalities at each time point; compare the relative contributions of inequalities before and during pregnancy to inequalities at birth; and examine associations between inequalities and coverage levels. We present the findings for countries individually and on aggregate, by World Bank country income grouping, as well as by maternal and neonatal tetanus elimination status, finding that most of the inequality in tetanus immunization coverage at birth is introduced during pregnancy. Inequalities in coverage during pregnancy are most pronounced in low- and lower-middle-income countries, and even more so in countries which have not achieved maternal and neonatal tetanus elimination. These findings suggest that pregnancy is a key time of opportunity for equity-oriented interventions to improve maternal tetanus immunization coverage.

Indexed as

health disparitieshealth inequalityimmunizationmaternal and neonatal tetanusvaccination

Identifiers

PMID38675813
PMCPMC11054082
OpenAlexW4394892302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.