Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38675266›Full record

ArticleMicromachines2024

Micro-Satellite Systems Design, Integration, and Flight.

Philip Naumann, Timothy Sands

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Micromachines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Philip NaumannSystems Engineering Program, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0323-318X
Timothy SandsDepartment of Mechanical Engineering (SCPD), Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Within the past decade, the aerospace engineering industry has evolved beyond the constraints of using single, large, custom satellites. Due to the increased reliability and robustness of commercial, off-the-shelf printed circuit board components, missions have instead transitioned towards deploying swarms of smaller satellites. Such an approach significantly decreases the mission cost by reducing custom engineering and deployment expenses. Nanosatellites can be quickly developed with a more modular design at lower risk. The Alpha mission at the Cornell University Space Systems Studio is fabricated in this manner. However, for the purpose of development, the initial proof of concept included a two-satellite system. The manuscript will discuss system engineering approaches used to model and mature the design of the pilot satellite. The two systems that will be primarily focused on are the attitude control system of the carrier nanosatellite and the radio frequency communications on the excreted femto-satellites. Milestones achieved include ChipSat to ChipSat communication, ChipSat to ground station communication, packet creation, error correction, appending a preamble, and filtering the signal. Other achievements include controller traceability/verification and validation, software rigidity tests, hardware endurance testing, Kane damper, and inertial measurement unit tuning. These developments matured the technological readiness level (TRL) of systems in preparation for satellite deployment.

Indexed as

CDMAcontroller optimization controller modelingcontroller verification and validationforward error correctionGFSKIMU tuningKane dampermatched filteringMBSEPD controllerRF communicationRTL-SDRsystems engineeringTinyGSTI-RTOS

Identifiers

PMID38675266
PMCPMC11052519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.