Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38674888›Full record

ReviewNutrients2024

Risk of Gluten Cross-Contamination Due to Food Handling Practices: A Mini-Review.

Renatta Pereira B Damasceno, Renata Puppin Zandonadi, Marcela Mendes, Luis Carlos Cunha Junior, António Raposo, Edite Teixeira-Lemos, Cláudia Chaves, Priscila Farage

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Reported Availability, Additional Cost and Use of Methods to Limit Cross-Contact of Gluten-Free Foods in Restaurants in a Canadian Large Urban Centre.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Renatta Pereira B DamascenoSchool of Nutrition, Federal University of Goiás (FANUT/UFG), Goiânia 74690-900, Goiás, Brazil.
Renata Puppin ZandonadiDepartment of Nutrition, College of Health Sciences, University of Brasília (UNB), Brasília 70910-900, Federal District, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0370-3089
Marcela MendesSchool of Nutrition, Federal University of Goiás (FANUT/UFG), Goiânia 74690-900, Goiás, Brazil.
Luis Carlos Cunha JuniorSchool of Agronomy, Federal University of Goiás (EA/UFG), Goiânia 74690-900, Goiás, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7490-4537
António RaposoCBIOS (Research Center for Biosciences and Health Technologies), Universidade Lusófona de Humanidades e Tecnologias, Campo Grande 376, 1749-024 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-5286-2249
Edite Teixeira-LemosCERNAS Research Centre, Polytechnic University of Viseu, 3504-510 Viseu, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-6346-8319
Cláudia ChavesESSV, Centre for Studies in Education and Innovation (CI&DEI), Polytechnic University of Viseu, 3504-510 Viseu, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-8103-7221
Priscila FarageSchool of Nutrition, Federal University of Goiás (FANUT/UFG), Goiânia 74690-900, Goiás, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Goiás · BRPolytechnic Institute of Viseu · PTResearch Center for Natural Resources, Environment and Society · PTUniversidade de Brasília · BRUniversidade Lusófona · PT

Funding

FCT-Foundation for Science and Technology, I.P. Refª UIDB/05507/2020 and UIDB/00681/202
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Celiac disease (CD) is an autoimmune disease triggered by the ingestion of gluten in genetically predisposed individuals, affecting 1.4% of the world population. CD induces an inflammatory reaction that compromises small intestine villi, leading to nutrient malabsorption, and gastro and extraintestinal manifestations. Although other treatment approaches are being studied, adherence to a gluten-free diet (GFD) is the only effective intervention to date. Despite this, about 50% of patients experience persistent inflammation, often associated with unintentional gluten ingestion through contaminated food. There are regulations for labeling gluten-free foods which specify a limit of 20 mg/kg (20 ppm). The risks of gluten cross-contamination above that level are present throughout the whole food production chain, emphasizing the need for caution. This review explores studies that tested different procedures regarding the shared production of gluten-containing and gluten-free food, including the use of shared equipment and utensils. A literature review covering PubMed, Scielo, Web of Science, VHL and Scopus identified five relevant studies. The results indicate that shared environments and equipment may not significantly increase gluten cross-contamination if appropriate protocols are followed. Simultaneous cooking of gluten-containing and gluten-free pizzas in shared ovens has demonstrated a low risk of contamination. In general, shared kitchen utensils and equipment (spoon, ladle, colander, knife, fryer, toaster) in controlled experiments did not lead to significant contamination of samples. On the other hand, cooking gluten-free and gluten-containing pasta in shared water resulted in gluten levels above the established limit of 20 ppm. However, rinsing the pasta under running water for a few seconds was enough to reduce the gluten content of the samples to less than 20 ppm.

Indexed as

Celiac DiseaseDiet, Gluten-FreeFood ContaminationFood HandlingGlutensCookingHumansGlutensceliac diseasecontaminationglutengluten cross-contactgluten-freegluten-free diet

Identifiers

PMID38674888
PMCPMC11055037
OpenAlexW4394923116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.