Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38674882›Full record

ArticleNutrients2024

Allergenic Shrimp Tropomyosin Distinguishes from a Non-Allergenic Chicken Homolog by Pronounced Intestinal Barrier Disruption and Downstream Th2 Responses in Epithelial and Dendritic Cell (Co)Culture.

Marit Zuurveld, Anna M Ogrodowczyk, Sara Benedé, Rebecca Czolk, Simona Lucia Bavaro, Stefanie Randow, Lidia H Markiewicz, Barbara Wróblewska, Elena Molina, Annette Kuehn and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

Marit ZuurveldDivision of Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Science, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5948-0358
Anna M OgrodowczykDepartment of Immunology and Food Microbiology, Institute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research, Polish Academy of Sciences, 10-748 Olsztyn, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7350-4072
Sara BenedéDepartment of Bioactivity and Food Analysis, Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias de la Alimentación (CIAL, CSIC-UAM), 28049 Madrid, Spain.
Rebecca CzolkDepartment of Infection and Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, 4354 Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Simona Lucia BavaroInstitute of Sciences of Food Production, National Research Council (Ispa-Cnr), 70126 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5820-8088
Stefanie RandowDivision of Allergology, Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, 63225 Langen, Germany.
Lidia H MarkiewiczDepartment of Immunology and Food Microbiology, Institute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research, Polish Academy of Sciences, 10-748 Olsztyn, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0109-5710
Barbara WróblewskaDepartment of Immunology and Food Microbiology, Institute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research, Polish Academy of Sciences, 10-748 Olsztyn, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7383-7819
Elena MolinaDepartment of Bioactivity and Food Analysis, Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias de la Alimentación (CIAL, CSIC-UAM), 28049 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7918-7768
Annette KuehnDepartment of Infection and Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, 4354 Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Thomas HolzhauserDivision of Allergology, Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, 63225 Langen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7818-7261
Linette E M WillemsenDivision of Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Science, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9882-5331
InLife Institute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research, Polish Academy of Sciences · PLPaul Ehrlich Institut · DEUtrecht University · NLInstitute of Sciences of Food Production · ITInstituto de Investigación en Ciencias de la Alimentación · ESLuxembourg Institute of Health · LUUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ESUniversity of Luxembourg · LU

Funding

Health Holland LSHM18037IR & FR PASSpanish Ministry of Science and Innovation PID2021-123236OB-100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTropomyosins (TM) from vertebrates are generally non-allergenic, while invertebrate homologs are potent pan-allergens. This study aims to compare the risk of sensitization between chicken TM and shrimp TM through affecting the intestinal epithelial barrier integrity and type 2 mucosal immune activation.

methodsEpithelial activation and/or barrier effects upon exposure to 2-50 μg/mL chicken TM, shrimp TM or ovalbumin (OVA) as a control allergen, were studied using Caco-2, HT-29MTX, or HT-29 intestinal epithelial cells. Monocyte-derived dendritic cells (moDC), cocultured with HT-29 cells or moDC alone, were exposed to 50 μg/mL chicken TM or shrimp TM. Primed moDC were cocultured with naïve Th cells. Intestinal barrier integrity (TEER), gene expression, cytokine secretion and immune cell phenotypes were determined in these human in vitro models.

resultsShrimp TM, but not chicken TM or OVA exposure, profoundly disrupted intestinal barrier integrity and increased alarmin genes expression in Caco-2 cells. Proinflammatory cytokine secretion in HT-29 cells was only enhanced upon shrimp TM or OVA, but not chicken TM, exposure. Shrimp TM enhanced the maturation of moDC and chemokine secretion in the presence or absence of HT-29 cells, while only in the absence of epithelial cells chicken TM activated moDC. Direct exposure of moDC to shrimp TM increased IL13 and TNFα secretion by Th cells cocultured with these primed moDC, while shrimp TM exposure via HT-29 cells cocultured with moDC sequentially increased IL13 expression and IL4 secretion in Th cells.

conclusionsShrimp TM, but not chicken TM, disrupted the epithelial barrier while triggering type 2 mucosal immune activation, both of which are key events in allergic sensitization.

Indexed as

AllergensChickensCoculture TechniquesDendritic CellsIntestinal MucosaTh2 CellsTropomyosinAnimalsCaco-2 CellsCytokinesEpithelial CellsHT29 CellsHumansOvalbuminPenaeidaeAllergensCytokinesOvalbuminTropomyosinepithelial barrierfood allergymucosal immunologysensitizing allergenicitytropomyosins

Identifiers

PMID38674882
PMCPMC11053543
OpenAlexW4394891608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.