ArticleMicroorganisms2024
Comparative Effect of Seed Coating and Biopriming of
Article in Microorganisms, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- PGPR inoculation and growth enhancement of crops cultivated in hydroponic systems.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Review
- Potassium Humate andPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Seed Biopriming for Climate Stress Resilience: Molecular, Physiological, and Epigenetic Mechanisms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Seed coating for biocontrol: a sustainable strategy against fungal pathogens in okra and cotton.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · 2026Article
- Comparative efficacy of seed biopriming and soil drenching with Bacillus altitudinis TM22 and Bacillus atrophaeus MCM61 on the suppression of Fusarium wilt of cotton.Pest management science · 2026Article
- Biocontrol potential of endophytic bacteria againstFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Bacterial endophytes suppress collar rot of chickpea caused byFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Biopolymer-based seed biopriming with fungal endophytes suppresses Fusarium wilt and modulates growth in tomato.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Endophytic and Epiphytic Microorganisms as Biocontrol Agents: Mechanisms, Applications, and Metagenomic Approaches in Tomato Cultivation.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Unlocking Salinity Stress Resilience in Turnip (Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Antioxidant Responses and Redox Regulation Within Plant-Beneficial Microbe Interaction.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- The Potential of Microorganisms for the Control of Grape Downy Mildew-A Review.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Amazonian Bacteria from River Sediments as a Biocontrol Solution againstMicroorganisms · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Beneficial plant microbes can enhance the growth and quality of field crops. However, the benefits of microbes using cheap and efficient inoculation methods are still uncommon. Seed coating with biocontrol agents can reduce the amount of inocula along with having the potential for large-scale application. Hence, in this research work, the comparative potential of tomato seed coating and biopriming with
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.