ReviewMicroorganisms2024
Non-Microbiological Mycobacterial Detection Techniques for Quality Control of Biological Products: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Microorganisms, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative evaluation of three commercial real-time PCR kits for direct detection ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mycobacteria can be one of the main contaminants of biological products, and their presence can have serious consequences on patients' health. For this reason, the European Pharmacopoeia mandates the specific testing of biological products for mycobacteria, a critical regulatory requirement aimed at ensuring the safety of these products before they are released to the market. The current pharmacopeial reference, i.e., microbial culture method, cannot ensure an exhaustive detection of mycobacteria due to their growth characteristics. Additionally, the method is time consuming and requires a continuous supply of culture media, posing logistical challenges. Thus, to overcome these issues, pharmaceutical industries need to consider alternative non-microbiological techniques to detect these fastidious, slow-growing contaminating agents. This review provides an overview of alternative methods, which could be applied within a quality control environment for biological products and underlines their advantages and limitations. Nucleic acid amplification techniques or direct measurement of mycobacteria stand out as the most suitable alternatives for mycobacterial testing in biological products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.