Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38674691›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2024

Broiler Chicken Cecal Microbiome and Poultry Farming Productivity: A Meta-Analysis.

Dmitry Deryabin, Christina Lazebnik, Ludmila Vlasenko, Ilshat Karimov, Dianna Kosyan, Alexander Zatevalov, Galimzhan Duskaev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Effects of FermentedAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Demonstration of phage inhibitory action againstFrontiers in antibiotics · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dmitry DeryabinFederal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, January 9 Street, 29, 460000 Orenburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-9578-7947
Christina LazebnikFederal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, January 9 Street, 29, 460000 Orenburg, Russia.
Ludmila VlasenkoFederal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, January 9 Street, 29, 460000 Orenburg, Russia.
Ilshat KarimovOrenburg State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia, Sovetskaya Street, 6, 460014 Orenburg, Russia.
Dianna KosyanFederal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, January 9 Street, 29, 460000 Orenburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-2621-108X
Alexander ZatevalovG.N. Gabrichevsky Research Institute for Epidemiology and Microbiology, Admiral Makarov Street, 10, 125212 Moscow, Russia.
Galimzhan DuskaevFederal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, January 9 Street, 29, 460000 Orenburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-9015-8367

Funding

research project FNWZ-2022-0010Russian Science Foundation 22-16-00036
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cecal microbial community plays an important role in chicken growth and development via effective feed conversion and essential metabolite production. The aim of this study was to define the microbial community's variants in chickens' ceca and to explore the most significant association between the microbiome compositions and poultry farming productivity. The meta-analysis included original data from 8 control broiler chicken groups fed with a standard basic diet and 32 experimental groups supplemented with various feed additives. Standard Illumina 16S-RNA gene sequencing technology was used to characterize the chicken cecal microbiome. Zootechnical data sets integrated with the European Production Effectiveness Factor (EPEF) were collected. Analysis of the bacterial taxa abundance and co-occurrence in chicken cecal microbiomes revealed two alternative patterns:

Indexed as

broiler chickenscecal microbiomemicrobiome patternspoultry farming productivity

Identifiers

PMID38674691
PMCPMC11052200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.