Article in Microorganisms, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Michelle M PenaAgricultural and Livestock Microbiology Graduation Program, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal 14884-900, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4635-9679
Thaisa Z MartinsAgricultural and Livestock Microbiology Graduation Program, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal 14884-900, SP, Brazil.
Doron TeperDepartment of Plant Pathology and Weed Research, Institute of Plant Protection Agricultural Research Organization (ARO), Volcani Institute, Rishon LeZion 7505101, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-5608-1917
Caio ZamunerBiochemistry Building, Institute of Biosciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Rio Claro 13506-900, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2062-6345
Helen A AlvesDepartment of Agricultural, Livestock and Environmental Biotechnology, School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal 14884-900, SP, Brazil.
Henrique FerreiraBiochemistry Building, Institute of Biosciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Rio Claro 13506-900, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9183-9420
Nian WangCitrus Research and Education Center, Department of Microbiology and Cell Science, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Lake Alfred, FL 33850, USA.
Maria Inês T FerroDepartment of Agricultural, Livestock and Environmental Biotechnology, School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal 14884-900, SP, Brazil.
Jesus A FerroDepartment of Agricultural, Livestock and Environmental Biotechnology, School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal 14884-900, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3966-1303
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRAgricultural Research Organization · ILFlorida Department of Citrus · US
Funding
Coordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior Finance Code 001National Council for Scientific and Technological Development Grant No. 312089/2019-8
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Peptidoglycan hydrolases are enzymes responsible for breaking the peptidoglycan present in the bacterial cell wall, facilitating cell growth, cell division and peptidoglycan turnover.
Indexed as
cell divisioncitrus cankerpeptidoglycan hydrolaseperiplasmic protein
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
EnvC Homolog Encoded by · full record | OpenQuestion