Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38674432›Full record

ArticleGenes2024

Comparison of Fecal MicroRNA Isolation Using Various Total RNA Isolation Kits.

Theresa Lederer, Noam M Hipler, Cosima Thon, Juozas Kupcinskas, Alexander Link

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Liver Diseases: Science, Fiction and the Foreseeable Future.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Theresa LedererDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Otto-von-Guericke University, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany.
Noam M HiplerDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Otto-von-Guericke University, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany.
Cosima ThonDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Otto-von-Guericke University, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany.
Juozas KupcinskasDepartment of Gastroenterology and Institute for Digestive Research, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 44307 Kaunas, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0002-8760-7416
Alexander LinkDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Otto-von-Guericke University, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9514-4562
Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg · DELithuanian University of Health Sciences · LT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fecal specimens have long been regarded as promising sources for gastrointestinal cancer screening and have, thus, been extensively investigated in biomarker research. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small, non-coding RNA molecules involved in regulating various biological processes. They are commonly dysregulated during tumor development and exhibit differential expression in feces. To assess the preanalytical feasibility of fecal miRNA analysis, we systematically compared the performance of commonly used total RNA extraction methods. Fecal samples from healthy subjects were utilized for this evaluation. Various methods, including miRNeasy, Universal, Trizol, RNeasy, and mirVana kits, were employed to isolate total RNA. MiRNA expression analyses were conducted using TaqMan or SYBR Green qRT-PCR for a subset of miRNAs, with externally spiked-in cel-miR-39 used for normalization. Most methods demonstrated similar performance in terms of the total RNA concentration and purity. Externally spiked cel-miR-39 and endogenous miRNAs (RNU6b, miR-16, and miR-21) exhibited comparable concentrations across the different RNA isolation methods, whereas the RNeasy mini kit consistently yielded lower values. Our findings suggest that various isolation methods produce reproducible and comparable miRNA expression results, supporting the potential comparability and translational applicability of miRNA-based biomarker research in the future.

Indexed as

FecesMicroRNAsHumansReagent Kits, DiagnosticMicroRNAsReagent Kits, Diagnosticfecal biomarkermicroRNAmicroRNA kitstotal RNA

Identifiers

PMID38674432
PMCPMC11050405
OpenAlexW4394878786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.