ArticleGenes2024
Graph Node Classification to Predict Autism Risk in Genes.
Article in Genes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A risk prediction model for autism spectrum disorder integrating biopsychosocial factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis with multicenter validation.Translational pediatrics · 2025Article
- A lightweight, end-to-end explainable, and generalized attention-based graph neural network model trained on high-order spatiotemporal organization of dynamic functional connectivity to classify autistics from typically developing.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study explores the genetic risk associations with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) using graph neural networks (GNNs), leveraging the Sfari dataset and protein interaction network (PIN) data. We built a gene network with genes as nodes, chromosome band location as node features, and gene interactions as edges. Graph models were employed to classify the autism risk associated with newly introduced genes (test set). Three classification tasks were undertaken to test the ability of our models: binary risk association, multi-class risk association, and syndromic gene association. We tested graph convolutional networks, Graph Sage, graph transformer, and Multi-Layer Perceptron (Baseline) architectures on this problem. The Graph Sage model consistently outperformed the other models, showcasing its utility in classifying ASD-related genes. Our ablation studies show that the chromosome band location and protein interactions contain useful information for this problem. The models achieved 85.80% accuracy on the binary risk classification, 81.68% accuracy on the multi-class risk classification, and 90.22% on the syndromic classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.