Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38674382›Full record

ArticleGenes2024

Graph Node Classification to Predict Autism Risk in Genes.

Danushka Bandara, Kyle Riccardi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Danushka BandaraDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Fairfield University, Fairfield, CT 06824, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8885-622X
Kyle RiccardiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Fairfield University, Fairfield, CT 06824, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1534-7974

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study explores the genetic risk associations with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) using graph neural networks (GNNs), leveraging the Sfari dataset and protein interaction network (PIN) data. We built a gene network with genes as nodes, chromosome band location as node features, and gene interactions as edges. Graph models were employed to classify the autism risk associated with newly introduced genes (test set). Three classification tasks were undertaken to test the ability of our models: binary risk association, multi-class risk association, and syndromic gene association. We tested graph convolutional networks, Graph Sage, graph transformer, and Multi-Layer Perceptron (Baseline) architectures on this problem. The Graph Sage model consistently outperformed the other models, showcasing its utility in classifying ASD-related genes. Our ablation studies show that the chromosome band location and protein interactions contain useful information for this problem. The models achieved 85.80% accuracy on the binary risk classification, 81.68% accuracy on the multi-class risk classification, and 90.22% on the syndromic classification.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseNeural Networks, ComputerAutistic DisorderGene Regulatory NetworksHumansProtein Interaction Mapsautism risk classificationchromosome band featuresgene networksgraph neural networks

Identifiers

PMID38674382
PMCPMC11049455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.