Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38674352›Full record

ArticleGenes2024

Genomic Prediction from Multi-Environment Trials of Wheat Breeding.

Guillermo García-Barrios, Leonardo Crespo-Herrera, Serafín Cruz-Izquierdo, Paolo Vitale, José Sergio Sandoval-Islas, Guillermo Sebastián Gerard, Víctor Heber Aguilar-Rincón, Tarsicio Corona-Torres, José Crossa, Rosa Angela Pacheco-Gil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Mining QTLs and candidate genes in bread wheat associated with kernel hardness through GWAS.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Guillermo García-BarriosPostgrado en Recursos Genéticos y Productividad-Genética, Colegio de Postgraduados, Texcoco 56264, Estado de México, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-7571-1769
Leonardo Crespo-HerreraInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km 35 Carretera México-Veracruz, Texcoco 56237, Estado de México, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-0506-4700
Serafín Cruz-IzquierdoPostgrado en Recursos Genéticos y Productividad-Genética, Colegio de Postgraduados, Texcoco 56264, Estado de México, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-3947-5877
Paolo VitaleInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km 35 Carretera México-Veracruz, Texcoco 56237, Estado de México, Mexico.
José Sergio Sandoval-IslasPostgrado en Fitosanidad, Colegio de Postgraduados, Texcoco 56264, Estado de México, Mexico.
Guillermo Sebastián GerardInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km 35 Carretera México-Veracruz, Texcoco 56237, Estado de México, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-9112-3588
Víctor Heber Aguilar-RincónPostgrado en Recursos Genéticos y Productividad-Genética, Colegio de Postgraduados, Texcoco 56264, Estado de México, Mexico.
Tarsicio Corona-TorresPostgrado en Recursos Genéticos y Productividad-Genética, Colegio de Postgraduados, Texcoco 56264, Estado de México, Mexico.
José CrossaInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km 35 Carretera México-Veracruz, Texcoco 56237, Estado de México, Mexico.
Rosa Angela Pacheco-GilInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km 35 Carretera México-Veracruz, Texcoco 56237, Estado de México, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-7213-6391

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (INV-003439, BMGF/FCDO, Accelerating Genetic Gains in Maize and Wheat for Improved Live-lihoods (AG2MW)),
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic prediction relates a set of markers to variability in observed phenotypes of cultivars and allows for the prediction of phenotypes or breeding values of genotypes on unobserved individuals. Most genomic prediction approaches predict breeding values based solely on additive effects. However, the economic value of wheat lines is not only influenced by their additive component but also encompasses a non-additive part (e.g., additive × additive epistasis interaction). In this study, genomic prediction models were implemented in three target populations of environments (TPE) in South Asia. Four models that incorporate genotype × environment interaction (G × E) and genotype × genotype (GG) were tested: Factor Analytic (FA), FA with genomic relationship matrix (FA + G), FA with epistatic relationship matrix (FA + GG), and FA with both genomic and epistatic relationship matrices (FA + G + GG). Results show that the FA + G and FA + G + GG models displayed the best and a similar performance across all tests, leading us to infer that the FA + G model effectively captures certain epistatic effects. The wheat lines tested in sites in different TPE were predicted with different precisions depending on the cross-validation employed. In general, the best prediction accuracy was obtained when some lines were observed in some sites of particular TPEs and the worse genomic prediction was observed when wheat lines were never observed in any site of one TPE.

Indexed as

Epistasis, GeneticGene-Environment InteractionGenome, PlantGenomicsModels, GeneticPlant BreedingTriticumGenotypePhenotypebread wheatepistatic variancefactor analyticgenomic selection

Identifiers

PMID38674352
PMCPMC11049976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.