ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
Potential Diagnostic and Clinical Significance of Selected Genetic Alterations in Glioblastoma.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiogenomics for Glioblastoma Survival Prediction: Integrating Radiomics, Clinical, and Genomic Features Using Artificial Intelligence.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- A novel quinazolinone insulin receptor inhibitor and its synergy with an EGFR inhibitor in glucose-driven glioblastoma.Molecular oncology · 2026Article
- Potential Association of BRAF and PIK3CA Copy Number Alterations with Long-Term Survival in IDH-Wildtype Glioblastoma: A Pilot Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Multi-Omics Integration for Advancing Glioma Precision Medicine.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2026Review
- Human annexin A5 promotes glioma progression by targeting theFrontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Complex Diagnostic Challenges in Glioblastoma: The Role ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Glioblastoma Standard of Care: Effects on Tumor Evolution and Reverse Translation in Preclinical Models.Cancers · 2024Review
- 'I think both of us drew strength from it': qualitative reflections from next of kin following the death and post-mortem brain donation of a loved one with brain cancer.Palliative care and social practice · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Glioblastoma is currently considered the most common and, unfortunately, also the most aggressive primary brain tumor, with the highest morbidity and mortality rates. The average survival of patients diagnosed with glioblastoma is 14 months, and only 2% of patients survive 3 years after surgery. Based on our clinical experience and knowledge from extensive clinical studies, survival is mainly related to the molecular biological properties of glioblastoma, which are of interest to the general medical community. Our study examined a total of 71 retrospective studies published from 2016 through 2022 and available on PubMed that deal with mutations of selected genes in the pathophysiology of GBM. In conclusion, we can find other mutations within a given gene group that have different effects on the prognosis and quality of survival of a patient with glioblastoma. These mutations, together with the associated mutations of other genes, as well as intratumoral heterogeneity itself, offer enormous potential for further clinical research and possible application in therapeutic practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.