Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38673945›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2024

Current Fertility Preservation Steps in Young Women Suffering from Cancer and Future Perspectives.

Alicia Marco, Marta Gargallo, Jesús Ciriza, Ariella Shikanov, Laura Baquedano, Javier García Pérez-Llantada, Clara Malo

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Double jeopardy: howFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Gut microbiome speciesCurrent research in microbial sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Alicia MarcoFaculty of Medicine, University of Zaragoza, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain.
Marta GargalloInstitute for Health Research Aragón (IIS Aragón), 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.
Jesús CirizaInstitute for Health Research Aragón (IIS Aragón), 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.
Ariella ShikanovDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0159-6419
Laura BaquedanoDepartment of Gynecology, University Hospital Miguel Servat, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2047-8995
Javier García Pérez-LlantadaHospital Viamed Montecanal, 50012 Zaragoza, Spain.
Clara MaloInstitute for Health Research Aragón (IIS Aragón), 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.
Universidad de Zaragoza · ESHospital Universitario Miguel Servet · ESHospital Viamed Valvanera · ESInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Aragón · ESUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Childhood cancer incidence, especially in high-income countries, has led to a focus on preserving fertility in this vulnerable population. The common treatments, such as radiation and certain chemotherapeutic agents, though effective, pose a risk to fertility. For adult women, established techniques like embryo and egg freezing are standard, requiring ovarian stimulation. However, for prepubescent girls, ovarian tissue freezing has become the primary option, eliminating the need for hormonal preparation. This review describes the beginning, evolution, and current situation of the fertility preservation options for this young population. A total of 75 studies were included, covering the steps in the current fertility preservation protocols: (i) ovarian tissue extraction, (ii) the freezing method, and (iii) thawing and transplantation. Cryopreservation and the subsequent transplantation of ovarian tissue have resulted in successful fertility restoration, with over 200 recorded live births, including cases involving ovarian tissue cryopreserved from prepubescent girls. Despite promising results, challenges persist, such as follicular loss during transplantation, which is attributed to ischemic and oxidative damage. Optimizing ovarian tissue-freezing processes and exploring alternatives to transplantation, like in vitro systems for follicles to establish maturation, are essential to mitigating associated risks. Further research is required in fertility preservation techniques to enhance clinical outcomes in the future. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation appears to be a method with specific benefits, indications, and risks, which can be an important tool in terms of preserving fertility in younger women.

Indexed as

CryopreservationFertility PreservationNeoplasmsOvaryAdolescentChildFemaleHumansYoung Adultcancer treatmentcryopreservationfertility preservationfollicular lossovarian tissue

Identifiers

PMID38673945
PMCPMC11050570
OpenAlexW4394806708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.