Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38673779›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2024

Innovation in Non-Invasive Diagnosis and Disease Monitoring for Meningiomas.

Brianna Korte, Dimitrios Mathios

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Malignant Meningiomas: From Diagnostics to Treatment.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  3. Improvement of small extracellular vesicle isolation from mouse model blood.Extracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brianna KorteDepartment of Neurosurgery, Washington University Medical Campus, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Dimitrios MathiosDepartment of Neurosurgery, Washington University Medical Campus, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meningiomas are tumors of the central nervous system that vary in their presentation, ranging from benign and slow-growing to highly aggressive. The standard method for diagnosing and classifying meningiomas involves invasive surgery and can fail to provide accurate prognostic information. Liquid biopsy methods, which exploit circulating tumor biomarkers such as DNA, extracellular vesicles, micro-RNA, proteins, and more, offer a non-invasive and dynamic approach for tumor classification, prognostication, and evaluating treatment response. Currently, a clinically approved liquid biopsy test for meningiomas does not exist. This review provides a discussion of current research and the challenges of implementing liquid biopsy techniques for advancing meningioma patient care.

Indexed as

Meningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaBiomarkers, TumorExtracellular VesiclesHumansLiquid BiopsyPrognosisBiomarkers, Tumorbiomarkerbrain tumorcirculating tumor DNAextracellular vesicleliquid biopsymeningiomamicro-RNAseroreactivityspectroscopy

Identifiers

PMID38673779
PMCPMC11050588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.