Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38673465›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024

Isthmocele and Infertility.

Giorgio Maria Baldini, Dario Lot, Antonio Malvasi, Doriana Di Nanni, Antonio Simone Laganà, Cecilia Angelucci, Andrea Tinelli, Domenico Baldini, Giuseppe Trojano

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
14.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Giorgio Maria BaldiniMOMO' FertiLIFE, IVF Clinic, 76011 Bisceglie, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5061-8007
Dario LotMOMO' FertiLIFE, IVF Clinic, 76011 Bisceglie, Italy.
Antonio MalvasiObstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy.
Doriana Di NanniPathology Unit, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70125 Bari, Italy.
Antonio Simone LaganàUnit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Paolo Giaccone" Hospital, Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Childcare, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1543-2802
Cecilia AngelucciGynecology and Obstetrics Clinic, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy.ORCID 0009-0003-0544-0670
Andrea TinelliDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, "Veris Delli Ponti" Hospital, and CERICSAL (Centro di RIcerca Clinico SALentino), "Veris delli Ponti Hospital", 73020 Lecce, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8426-8490
Domenico BaldiniMOMO' FertiLIFE, IVF Clinic, 76011 Bisceglie, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1433-504X
Giuseppe TrojanoDepartment of Maternal and Child, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", 70124 Bari, Italy.
Ospedale degli Infermi · ITUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico "Paolo Giaccone" di Palermo · ITOspedale Madonna Delle Grazie · ITOspedale Veris Delli Ponti Scorrano · ITUniversity of Sassari · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Isthmocele is a gynecological condition characterized by a disruption in the uterine scar, often associated with prior cesarean sections. This anatomical anomaly can be attributed to inadequate or insufficient healing of the uterine wall following a cesarean incision. It appears that isthmocele may impact a woman's quality of life as well as her reproductive capacity. The incidence of isthmocele can range from 20% to 70% in women who have undergone a cesarean section. This review aims to sum up the current knowledge about the effect of isthmocele on fertility and the possible therapeutic strategies to achieve pregnancy. However, currently, there is not sufficiently robust evidence to indicate the need for surgical correction in all asymptomatic patients seeking fertility. In cases where surgical correction of isthmocele is deemed necessary, it is advisable to evaluate residual myometrial thickness (RMT). For patients with RMT >2.5-3 mm, hysteroscopy appears to be the technique of choice. In cases where the residual tissue is lower, recourse to laparotomic, laparoscopic, or vaginal approaches is warranted.

Indexed as

cesarean scar defecthysteroscopyICSIinfertilityisthmoceleIVFniche

Identifiers

PMID38673465
PMCPMC11050579
OpenAlexW4394689221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.