Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38673418›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2024

Exploring Allied Health Models of Care for Children with Developmental Health Concerns, Delays, and Disabilities in Rural and Remote Areas: A Systematic Scoping Review.

Georgia Gosse, Saravana Kumar, Helen Banwell, Anna Moran

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Georgia GosseInnovation Implementation and Clinical Translation, Allied Health and Human Performance Unit, University of South Australia, North Tce, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5460-6329
Saravana KumarInnovation Implementation and Clinical Translation, Allied Health and Human Performance Unit, University of South Australia, North Tce, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4003-4411
Helen BanwellInnovation Implementation and Clinical Translation, Allied Health and Human Performance Unit, University of South Australia, North Tce, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5730-1611
Anna MoranDepartment of Rural Health, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Graham St Shepparton, Melbourne, VIC 3630, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5999-0761

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccess to appropriate healthcare is essential for children's healthy development. This is lacking in rural and remote areas, impacting health outcomes. Despite efforts to improve access for these communities, to date, no review has systematically mapped the literature on allied health models of care for children with developmental needs. This scoping review seeks to address this knowledge gap.

methodsAdhering to the PRISMA-ScR and Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines, a systematic search was conducted. A total of 8 databases (from inception to May 2023) and 106 grey literature sources were searched. Two reviewers independently undertook a two-stage screening process. Data were extracted using customised tools and narratively synthesised utilising the Institute of Medicine's quality domains. This review is registered a priori via Open Science Framework.

resultsTwenty-five citations were identified within the literature. Varied models of care were reported from five mostly Western countries. Models of care identified in these areas were classified as screening services, role substitution, consultative services, or online-based services. Positive impacts on quality of healthcare were reported across all quality domains (apart from safety) with the domain of effectiveness being the most commonly reported.

conclusionsMultiple models of care are currently in operation for children with developmental needs in rural and remote areas and appear to improve the quality of care. Due to complexities within, and limitations of, the evidence base, it is unclear if one model of care is superior to another. This review provides a basis for further research to explore why some models may be more effective than others.

Indexed as

Developmental DisabilitiesRural PopulationAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInfantallied healthchild healthdevelopmenthealth servicespaediatricsrural and remote

Identifiers

PMID38673418
PMCPMC11050593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.