Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38673365›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2024

Combining the Antenatal Risk Questionnaire and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in Early Pregnancy in Danish Antenatal Care-A Qualitative Descriptive Study.

Lotte Broberg, Jane M Bendix, Katrine Røhder, Ellen Løkkegaard, Mette Væver, Julie C Grew, Helle Johnsen, Mette Juhl, Vibeke de Lichtenberg, Michaela Schiøtz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lotte BrobergCenter for Clinical Research and Prevention, Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg Hospital, Nordre Fasanvej 57, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1778-7941
Jane M BendixDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Copenhagen University Hospital-North Zealand, Dyrehavevej 29, 3400 Hillerød, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3341-6689
Katrine RøhderCenter for Early Intervention and Family Research, Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 2A, 1353 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ellen LøkkegaardDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Copenhagen University Hospital-North Zealand, Dyrehavevej 29, 3400 Hillerød, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4149-5663
Mette VæverCenter for Early Intervention and Family Research, Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 2A, 1353 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9675-3423
Julie C GrewCenter for Clinical Research and Prevention, Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg Hospital, Nordre Fasanvej 57, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5770-9174
Helle JohnsenDepartment of Midwifery and Therapeutic Science, University College Copenhagen, Sigurdsgade 26, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mette JuhlDepartment of Midwifery and Therapeutic Science, University College Copenhagen, Sigurdsgade 26, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Vibeke de LichtenbergDepartment of Midwifery and Therapeutic Science, University College Copenhagen, Sigurdsgade 26, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Michaela SchiøtzCenter for Clinical Research and Prevention, Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg Hospital, Nordre Fasanvej 57, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2575-6686
Frederiksberg Hospital · DKUniversity College Copenhagen · DKCopenhagen University Hospital · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

The Liljeborg Foundation No grant number provided
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pregnant women with a history of mental disorders, neglect, or low social support are at increased risk of mental health problems. It is crucial to identify psychosocial risk factors in early pregnancy to reduce the risk of short- and long-term health consequences for mother and child. The Antenatal Risk Questionnaire has been found acceptable as a psychosocial screening tool among pregnant women in Australia, but it has not been tested in a Scandinavian context. The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of pregnant women when using the Antenatal Risk Questionnaire and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale as part of a model to identify psychosocial vulnerabilities in pregnancy in Denmark. We conducted individual interviews (

Indexed as

Prenatal CareAdultDenmarkDepression, PostpartumFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnant PeoplePsychiatric Status Rating ScalesQualitative ResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultdepressioninterviewmental healthpregnancy

Identifiers

PMID38673365
PMCPMC11050197
OpenAlexW4394567544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.