Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38673305›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2024

The Elephant in the Room: A Systematic Review of the Application and Effects of Psychological Treatments for Pregnant Women with Dual Pathology (Mental Health and Substance-Related Disorders).

Irene Caro-Cañizares, Nayara López Carpintero, Rodrigo Carmona-Camacho

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Irene Caro-CañizaresFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud y la Educación, Universidad a Distancia de Madrid, UDIMA, 28400 Collado Villalba, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0671-4701
Nayara López CarpinteroDepartamento de Obstetricia y Ginecología, Hospital Universitario del Tajo, 28300 Aranjuez, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3219-3922
Rodrigo Carmona-CamachoDepartamento de Psiquiatría, Fundación Jiménez Díaz, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Hospital Universitario del Tajo · ESHospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz · ESUniversidad a Distancia de Madrid · ES

Funding

Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, and Government Delegation for the National Plan on Drugs, from the Secretary of State for Social Services and Equality of the Ministry of Health and Consumer Affairs PSI2016-75854-P (20151073)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMaternal mental health and substance use, referred to as dual pathology, represent significant concerns associated with adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes, a prevalence higher than commonly anticipated. Nonetheless, a notable dearth exists ofevidence-based treatment protocols tailored for pregnant women with dual pathology.

methodsA systematic review, adhering to the PRISMA methodology, was conducted.

resultsOut of the 57 identified papers deemed potentially relevant, only 2were ultimately included. Given the limited number of studies assessing the efficacy of psychological interventions utilizing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for both mental health and substance misuse, and considering the diverse objectives and measures employed, definitive conclusions regarding the effectiveness of psychological interventions in this domain prove challenging.

conclusionsMaternal mental health appears to be the proverbial "elephant in the room". The development of specialized and integrated interventions stands as an imperative to effectively address this pressing issue. As elucidated in the present review, these interventions ought to be grounded in empirical evidence. Furthermore, it is essential that such interventions undergo rigorous evaluation through RCTs to ascertain their efficacy levels. Ultimately, the provision of these interventions by psychology/psychiatric professionals, both within clinical practice and the RCTs themselves, is recommended to facilitate the generalizability of the results to specialized settings.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersPregnancy ComplicationsSubstance-Related DisordersFemaleHumansMental HealthPregnancyPregnant PeoplePsychotherapydual pathologymental healthpregnancysubstance usesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID38673305
PMCPMC11050033
OpenAlexW4393162485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.