ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Pull-Through Behavior of Novel Additively Manufactured Sandwich Composite Inserts.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quasi-Static Penetration Resistance of Bio-Inspired Helicoidal Honeycomb Sandwich Panels: Experiments, Simulations, and Damage Mechanisms.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Comparative Study on the Finite Element Analysis of Multilayered Honeycomb Composite Materials for Aerospace Structures.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Joining structural components with mechanical fasteners is common in many engineering applications across all industries. This study investigates combining additive manufactured inserts with sandwich composites consisting of aluminum honeycomb cores with carbon fiber reinforced facesheets. The combination of these components offers an integrated, lightweight solution when mechanically fastening sandwich composite components using bolted joints. The experimental and numerical investigation explores the influence insert geometry has on the structural response of a sandwich composite under pull-through load scenarios. Various failure modes are observed during experimental analysis with facesheet debonding being the initial failure mode. In addition, finite element models investigate the stress fields in the honeycomb core and overall panel deflections, validating the mechanics observed experimentally. When comparing additively manufactured inserts to standard inserts, additively manufactured inserts have increases in stiffness, maximum force, and total energy absorption of 7.1%, 53.0%, and 62.3%, respectively. These results illustrate the potential of an integrated approach to mechanical joint technology by combining additively manufactured inserts with sandwich composite components using aluminum honeycomb cores.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.