Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38673058›Full record

ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2024

Fertility Preservation in the Era of Immuno-Oncology: Lights and Shadows.

Erica Silvestris, Stella D'Oronzo, Easter Anna Petracca, Claudia D'Addario, Gennaro Cormio, Vera Loizzi, Stefano Canosa, Giacomo Corrado

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Erica SilvestrisGynecologic Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II" Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7415-5986
Stella D'OronzoDepartment of Interdisciplinary Medicine (DIM), University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70121 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1071-2058
Easter Anna PetraccaGynecologic Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II" Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0562-3579
Claudia D'AddarioDepartment of Interdisciplinary Medicine (DIM), University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70121 Bari, Italy.
Gennaro CormioGynecologic Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II" Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5745-372X
Vera LoizziGynecologic Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II" Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4006-6421
Stefano CanosaIVIRMA, Global Research Alliance, LIVET, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6402-6750
Giacomo CorradoGynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Woman, Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, 00136 Roma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8319-6146
Istituto Tumori Bari · ITUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · ITAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, immuno-oncology has revolutionized the cancer treatment field by harnessing the immune system's power to counteract cancer cells. While this innovative approach holds great promise for improving cancer outcomes, it also raises important considerations related to fertility and reproductive toxicity. In fact, most young females receiving gonadotoxic anti-cancer treatments undergo iatrogenic ovarian exhaustion, resulting in a permanent illness that precludes the vocation of motherhood as a natural female sexual identity. Although commonly used, oocyte cryopreservation for future in vitro fertilization and even ovarian cortex transplantation are considered unsafe procedures in cancer patients due to their oncogenic risks; whereas, ovarian stem cells might support neo-oogenesis, providing a novel stemness model of regenerative medicine for future fertility preservation programs in oncology. Recent scientific evidence has postulated that immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) might in some way reduce fertility by inducing either primary or secondary hypogonadism, whose incidence and mechanisms are not yet known. Therefore, considering the lack of data, it is currently not possible to define the most suitable FP procedure for young patients who are candidates for ICIs. In this report, we will investigate the few available data concerning the molecular regulation of ICI therapy and their resulting gonadal toxicity, to hypothesize the most suitable fertility preservation strategy for patients receiving these drugs.

Indexed as

assisted reproductionfertility preservationinfertilityreproductive medicine

Identifiers

PMID38673058
PMCPMC11050999
OpenAlexW4394956785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.