ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2024
Prediction of Acute Cardiac Rejection Based on Gene Expression Profiles.
Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- An Approach to Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Pediatric Liver Transplantation.Pediatric transplantation · 2026Review
- DDR1 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: bioinformatics discovery and experimental validation.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Regulatory T cells in cardiac allograft vasculopathy: from mechanistic insights to clinical tolerance.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Sex-Specific Prediction Models of Alzheimer's Disease: A Gene Expression Analysis.International journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence optimizes immune rejection prediction and management in heart transplantation: a structured narrative review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Integrative bulk and single-cell transcriptome analyses reveal integrated stress response-related biomarkers in periodontitis with experimental validation.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Acute cardiac rejection remains a significant challenge in the post-transplant period, necessitating meticulous monitoring and timely intervention to prevent graft failure. Thus, the goal of the present study was to identify novel biomarkers involved in acute cardiac rejection, paving the way for personalized diagnostic, preventive, and treatment strategies. A total of 809 differentially expressed genes were identified in the GSE150059 dataset. We intersected genes selected by analysis of variance, recursive feature elimination, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, and random forest classifier to identify the most relevant genes involved in acute cardiac rejection. Thus, HCP5, KLRD1, GZMB, PLA1A, GNLY, and KLRB1 were used to train eight machine learning models: random forest, logistic regression, decision trees, support vector machines, gradient boosting machines, K-nearest neighbors, XGBoost, and neural networks. Models were trained, tested, and validated on the GSE150059 dataset (MMDx-based diagnosis of rejection). Eight algorithms achieved great performance in predicting acute cardiac rejection. However, all machine learning models demonstrated poor performance in two external validation sets that had rejection diagnosis based on histology: merged GSE2596 and GSE4470 dataset and GSE9377 dataset, thus highlighting differences between these two methods. According to SHAP and LIME, KLRD1 and HCP5 were the most impactful genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.