Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38673025›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2024

Using Machine Learning with Impulse Oscillometry Data to Develop a Predictive Model for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Asthma.

Chien-Hua Huang, Kun-Ta Chou, Diahn-Warng Perng, Yi-Han Hsiao, Chien-Wen Huang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chien-Hua HuangDepartment of Eldercare, College of Nursing, Central Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taichung 406053, Taiwan.
Kun-Ta ChouDepartment of Chest Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 112201, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-4822-5474
Diahn-Warng PerngDepartment of Chest Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 112201, Taiwan.
Yi-Han HsiaoDepartment of Chest Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 112201, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-4111-5432
Chien-Wen HuangDivision of Chest Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Asia University Hospital, Taichung 413505, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-2893-1574
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWAsia University · TW

Funding

Asia University Hospital 11051007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to develop and validate a machine learning model using impulse oscillometry system (IOS) profiles for accurately classifying patients into three assessment-based categories: no airflow obstruction, asthma, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Our research questions were as follows: (1) Can machine learning methods accurately classify obstructive disease states based solely on multidimensional IOS data? (2) Which IOS parameters and modeling algorithms provide the best discrimination? We used data for 480 patients (240 with COPD and 240 with asthma) and 84 healthy individuals for training. Physiological and IOS parameters were combined into six feature combinations. The classification algorithms tested were logistic regression, random forest, neural network, k-nearest neighbor, and support vector machine. The optimal feature combination for identifying individuals without pulmonary obstruction, with asthma, or with COPD included 15 IOS and physiological features. The neural network classifier achieved the highest accuracy (0.786). For discriminating between healthy and unhealthy individuals, two combinations of twenty-three features performed best in the neural network algorithm (accuracy of 0.929). When distinguishing COPD from asthma, the best combination included 15 features and the neural network algorithm achieved an accuracy of 0.854. This study provides compelling technical evidence and clinical justifications for advancing IOS data-driven models to aid in COPD and asthma management.

Indexed as

COPDimpulse oscillometrymachine learning

Identifiers

PMID38673025
PMCPMC11051459
OpenAlexW4394622082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.