Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38673024›Full record

ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2024

Chest Radiography Pearls in Select Adult Congenital Heart Disease.

William A Schiavone, David S Majdalany

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

William A SchiavoneCleveland Clinic Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland, OH 44120, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8919-6537
David S MajdalanyDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5472-6689

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Congenital heart disease in adult patients (ACHD) includes individuals with native anatomic deformities and those who have benefited from corrective, ameliorative, or interventional heart and vascular interventions. Congenital heart disease is the most common birth defect, although with interventions most survive into adulthood. Newborns and children with complex congenital heart diseases that feature cyanosis fail to thrive, and once this is identified, heart failure can promptly undergo diagnostic evaluations and treatment. However, patients with simple congenital heart disease and subtle clinical signs and symptoms may escape diagnosis until adulthood or experience changes in their cardiac hemodynamics and physiology in settings such as pregnancy or newly diagnosed arrhythmias. The chest X-ray (CXR) is the most common X-ray among all radiological procedures. Individual features or a constellation of features on a CXR are often present in patients who have congenital heart disease. The ability to recognize these CXR features is a valuable skill for making the diagnosis of ACHD and for following these patients as they age, and can complement echocardiographic findings. When used well to diagnose ACHD, the CXR will be the sharpest arrow in the quiver.

Indexed as

Adult Congenital Heart Disease (ACHD)chest X-ray (CXR)

Identifiers

PMID38673024
PMCPMC11051131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.