ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2024
The Value of the Electrocardiogram in Adult Congenital Heart Disease.
Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The electrocardiogram is the first test that is undertaken when evaluating a patient's heart. Diagnosing congenital heart disease in an adult (ACHD) can be facilitated by knowing the classical electrocardiographic (EKG) findings. These EKG findings often result from the congenital defect that prevents a part of the cardiac conduction system from occupying its normal anatomic position. When these classical EKG findings are not present, the clinician should consider alternate diagnoses. As the patient with congenital heart disease ages, with native anatomy or after surgical or device repair, the EKG can be used to assess the patient's status and to decide if and when treatment requires adjustment. This is because the electrocardiogram (EKG) can diagnose the hypertrophy or enlargement in a cardiac chamber that results from the congenital defect or anomaly and can diagnose an arrhythmia that might compromise an otherwise stable anatomy. While ACHD often involves intracardiac shunting, in many cases the abnormality only involves cardiac electrical conduction block or ventricular repolarization. These life-threatening diseases can be diagnosed with an EKG. This review will demonstrate and explain how the EKG can be used to diagnose and follow adults with congenital heart disease. When coupled with history and physical examination, the value of the EKG in ACHD will be apparent. A diagnosis can then be made or a differential diagnosis proposed, before an imaging study is ordered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.