Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38672960›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2024

Pathology Laboratory Archives: Conservation Quality of Nucleic Acids and Proteins for NSCLC Molecular Testing.

Albino Eccher, Davide Seminati, Vincenzo L'Imperio, Gabriele Casati, Daniela Pilla, Umberto Malapelle, Isabella Piga, Greta Bindi, Alessandro Marando, Emanuela Bonoldi and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Albino EccherDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41121 Modena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9992-5550
Davide SeminatiDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Pathology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2166-301X
Vincenzo L'ImperioDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Pathology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9284-2998
Gabriele CasatiDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Pathology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy.
Daniela PillaDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Pathology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy.
Umberto MalapelleDepartment of Public Health, Pathology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3211-9957
Isabella PigaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8221-2493
Greta BindiProteomics and Metabolomics Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1160-2176
Alessandro MarandoDepartment of Pathology, ASST Grande Ospedale Niguarda, 20162 Milan, Italy.
Emanuela BonoldiDepartment of Pathology, ASST Grande Ospedale Niguarda, 20162 Milan, Italy.
Emanuele DaineseDepartment of Pathology, ASST Valtellina e Alto Lario, 23100 Sondrio, Italy.
Mattia RiefoloPathology Unit, Department of Diagnostic Medicine and Prevention, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Antonia D'ErricoPathology Unit, Department of Diagnostic Medicine and Prevention, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2747-3732
Matteo CostantiniDepartment of Pathology, University Hospital of Modena, 41121 Modena, Italy.
Alberto LugliDepartment of Pathology, University Hospital of Modena, 41121 Modena, Italy.
Stefano GrassiPathology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Aldo ScarpaDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1678-739X
Angelo Paolo Dei TosDepartment of Pathology, University of Padua School of Medicine, Azienda Ospedale Università Padova, 35122 Padua, Italy.
Fabio PagniDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Pathology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9625-1637
University of Milano-Bicocca · ITUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda · ITIRCCS Azienda Ospedliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale della Valtellina e Alto Lario · ITFederico II University Hospital · ITUniversity of Cagliari · ITUniversity of Padua · ITUniversity of Verona · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the molecular era, proper archival conditions within pathology laboratories are crucial, especially for formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue specimens retrieved years after the original diagnosis. Indeed, improper preservation can impact the integrity of nucleic acids and protein antigens. This study evaluates the quality status of stored FFPE blocks using multilevel omics approaches. FFPE blocks from 45 Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma (NSCLC) cases were analyzed. The blocks were collected from six different pathology archives across Italy with distinct environmental characteristics. Nucleic acids' quantity and quality, as well as protein antigens, were assessed using various techniques, including MALDI-MSI. RNA was quantitatively higher, but more fragmented, compared to DNA. DNA quantity and quality were suitable for molecular analyses in 94.4% and 62.3% of samples, respectively. RNA quantity was adequate across all samples, but it was optimal only in 22.3% of cases. DNA quality started to deteriorate after 6-8 years, whereas RNA quality diminished only after 10 years of storage. These data might suggest a particular DNA susceptibility to FFPE blocks conservation. Immunohistochemical intensity decreased significantly after 6-8 years of storage, and MALDI-MSI analysis revealed that younger tissue blocks contained more unique proteomic signals than the older ones. This study emphasizes the importance of proper FFPE archiving conditions for molecular analyses. Governance should prioritize attention to pathology archives to ensure quality preservation and optimize predictive testing. By elucidating the nuances of FFPE block storage, this research paves the way for enhanced molecular diagnostics and therapeutic insights regarding oncology and beyond.

Indexed as

conservation qualityFFPE blocksNSCLCpathology laboratory archive

Identifiers

PMID38672960
PMCPMC11050929
OpenAlexW4393086585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.