Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38672721›Full record

ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Ablative Treatments for Small Renal Masses and Management of Recurrences: A Comprehensive Review.

Achille Aveta, Vincenzo Iossa, Gianluca Spena, Paolo Conforti, Giovanni Pagano, Fabrizio Dinacci, Paolo Verze, Celeste Manfredi, Matteo Ferro, Francesco Lasorsa and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
11.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Achille AvetaDepartment of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8470-1995
Vincenzo IossaDepartment of Urology, Umberto I Hospital, ASL Salerno, 84014 Nocera Inferiore, Italy.
Gianluca SpenaDepartment of Urology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, "Fondazione G. Pascale", 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6714-9315
Paolo ConfortiDepartment of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.
Giovanni PaganoDepartment of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.
Fabrizio DinacciDepartment of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.
Paolo VerzeDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Scuola Medica Salernitana, University of Salerno, 84081 Fisciano, Italy.
Celeste ManfrediUnit of Urology, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9706-8516
Matteo FerroDivision of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 71013 Milan, Italy.
Francesco LasorsaDepartment of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area-Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8884-0757
Lorenzo SpiritoUnit of Urology, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80131 Naples, Italy.
Luigi NapolitanoDepartment of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2036-0356
Antonio TufanoDepartment of Urology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, "Fondazione G. Pascale", 80131 Naples, Italy.
Alessandra FiorenzaDepartment of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.
Pierluigi RussoDepartment of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7789-9486
Fabio CrocerossaDivision of Urology, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5114-2952
Giuseppe LucarelliDepartment of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area-Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7807-1229
Sisto PerdonàDepartment of Urology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, "Fondazione G. Pascale", 80131 Naples, Italy.
Roberto SanseverinoDepartment of Urology, Umberto I Hospital, ASL Salerno, 84014 Nocera Inferiore, Italy.
Salvatore SiracusanoDepartment of Urology, University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.
Simone CilioDepartment of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8431-9830
Savio Domenico PandolfoDepartment of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9621-3059
University of Naples Federico II · ITIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · ITOspedali Riuniti Umberto I · ITUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · ITUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITUniversity of L'Aquila · ITUniversity of Salerno · ITAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITEuropean Institute of Oncology · ITMagna Graecia University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review focuses on ablative techniques for small renal masses (SRMs), including radiofrequency ablation (RFA), cryoablation (CA), microwave ablation (MWA), and irreversible electroporation (IRE), and discusses recurrence management. Through an extensive literature review, we outline the procedures, outcomes, and follow-up strategies associated with each ablative method. The review provides a detailed examination of these techniques-RFA, CA, MWA, and IRE-elucidating their respective outcomes. Recurrence rates vary among them, with RFA and CA showing comparable rates, MWA demonstrating favorable short-term results, and IRE exhibiting promise in experimental stages. For managing recurrences, various strategies are considered, including active surveillance, re-ablation, or salvage surgery. Surveillance is preferred post-RFA and post-CA, due to slow SRM growth, while re-ablation, particularly with RFA and CA, is deemed feasible without additional complications. Salvage surgery emerges as a viable option for larger or resistant tumors. While ablative techniques offer short-term results comparable to surgery, further research is essential to understand their long-term effects fully. Decisions concerning recurrence management should consider individual and tumor-specific factors. Imaging, notably contrast-enhanced ultrasounds, plays a pivotal role in assessing treatment success, emphasizing the necessity of a multidisciplinary approach for optimal outcomes. The lack of randomized trials highlights the need for further research.

Indexed as

ablative techniquesRCCrecurrencesmall renal masses

Identifiers

PMID38672721
PMCPMC11050889
OpenAlexW4393253995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.