Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38672676›Full record

ReviewCancers2024

Endovascular Applications for the Management of High-Grade Gliomas in the Modern Era.

Ari D Kappel, Rohan Jha, Saibaba Guggilapu, William J Smith, Abdullah H Feroze, Adam A Dmytriw, Juan Vicenty-Padilla, Rodolfo E Alcedo Guardia, Florian A Gessler, Nirav J Patel and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Ari D KappelHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6179-8461
Rohan JhaHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Saibaba GuggilapuHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
William J SmithHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Abdullah H FerozeHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Adam A DmytriwHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Juan Vicenty-PadillaNeurosurgery Section, School of Medicine University of Puerto Rico, Medical Sciences Campus, San Juan P.O. Box 365067, Puerto Rico.
Rodolfo E Alcedo GuardiaNeurosurgery Section, School of Medicine University of Puerto Rico, Medical Sciences Campus, San Juan P.O. Box 365067, Puerto Rico.ORCID 0009-0006-1845-263X
Florian A GesslerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Rostock University Hospital, 18057 Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3471-0575
Nirav J PatelHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Rose DuHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2641-6496
Alfred P SeeHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3634-4692
Pier Paolo PeruzziHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5034-2963
Mohammad A Aziz-SultanHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Joshua D BernstockHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7814-3867

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-grade gliomas (HGGs) have a poor prognosis and are difficult to treat. This review examines the evolving landscape of endovascular therapies for HGGs. Recent advances in endovascular catheter technology and delivery methods allow for super-selective intra-arterial cerebral infusion (SSIACI) with increasing precision. This treatment modality may offer the ability to deliver anti-tumoral therapies directly to tumor regions while minimizing systemic toxicity. However, challenges persist, including blood-brain barrier (BBB) penetration, hemodynamic complexities, and drug-tumor residence time. Innovative adjunct techniques, such as focused ultrasound (FUS) and hyperosmotic disruption, may facilitate BBB disruption and enhance drug penetration. However, hemodynamic factors that limit drug residence time remain a limitation. Expanding therapeutic options beyond chemotherapy, including radiotherapy and immunobiologics, may motivate future investigations. While preclinical and clinical studies demonstrate moderate efficacy, larger randomized trials are needed to validate the clinical benefits. Additionally, future directions may involve endovascular sampling for peri-tumoral surveillance; changes in drug formulations to prolong residence time; and the exploration of non-pharmaceutical therapies, like radioembolization and photodynamic therapy. Endovascular strategies hold immense potential in reshaping HGG treatment paradigms, offering targeted and minimally invasive approaches. However, overcoming technical challenges and validating clinical efficacy remain paramount for translating these advancements into clinical care.

Indexed as

blood–brain barrierdrug deliveryendovascularfocused ultrasoundfuture therapiesglioblastomahigh-grade gliomainterventional neuroradiology

Identifiers

PMID38672676
PMCPMC11049132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.