Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38672618›Full record

ArticleCancers2024

The Vanishing Clinical Value of PD-L1 Status as a Predictive Biomarker in the First-Line Treatment of Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder.

Alexander Tamalunas, Can Aydogdu, Lena M Unterrainer, Melanie Schott, Severin Rodler, Stephan Ledderose, Gerald B Schulz, Christian G Stief, Jozefina Casuscelli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexander TamalunasDepartment of Urology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4659-2262
Can AydogduDepartment of Urology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Lena M UnterrainerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Melanie SchottDepartment of Urology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Severin RodlerDepartment of Urology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7600-6535
Stephan LedderoseDepartment of Pathology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Gerald B SchulzDepartment of Urology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0340-0304
Christian G StiefDepartment of Urology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Jozefina CasuscelliDepartment of Urology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.
LMU Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOur study endeavors to elucidate the clinical implications of PD-L1 positivity in individuals afflicted with advanced urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB).

methodsPatients with advanced UCB were prospectively enrolled following a radical cystectomy (RC) performed within January 2017 to December 2022 at our tertiary referral center. The clinical outcome, defined as the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) on systemic treatment, was analyzed using an χ

resultsA total of 648 patients were included following an RC performed within January 2017 to December 2022. Their PD-L1 status was analyzed with the primary PD-L1-specific antibody (clone SP263, Ventana) and defined both by the CPS and IC-score in 282 patients (43.5%) with a high risk (pT3-pT4 and/or lymph node involvement) or metastatic UCB. While the median PFS was significantly prolonged 5-fold in PD-L1+ patients, we found no difference in OS, regardless of PD-L1 status, or treatment regimen.

conclusionsWhile PD-L1 positivity indicates prolonged PFS, the presence of PD-L1 does not influence OS rates, suggesting its limited usefulness as a prognostic biomarker in bladder cancer. However, the positive correlation between an PD-L1 status and a sustained response to ICI treatments indicates its potential role as a predictive biomarker. Further research is required to understand how the predictive value of PD-L1 positivity may extend to the use of ICIs in combination with antibody-drug conjugates.

Indexed as

biomarkerbladder canceroncologyPD-L1systemic treatmenturology

Identifiers

PMID38672618
PMCPMC11049370
OpenAlexW4394931764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.