Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38672545›Full record

ReviewCancers2024

Revitalizing Cancer Treatment: Exploring the Role of Drug Repurposing.

RamaRao Malla, Sathiyapriya Viswanathan, Sree Makena, Shruti Kapoor, Deepak Verma, Alluri Ashok Raju, Manikantha Dunna, Nethaji Muniraj

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Global determinants of gynecologic cancer incidence and mortality: A cluster-based analysis with predictive insights.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Drug Repurposing for Cancer Treatment: A Comprehensive Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

RamaRao MallaCancer Biology Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry and Bioinformatics, GITAM School of Science, GITAM (Deemed to be University), Visakhapatnam 530045, Andhra Pradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2448-1681
Sathiyapriya ViswanathanDepartment of Biochemistry, ACS Medical College and Hospital, Chennai 600007, Tamil Nadu, India.
Sree MakenaMaharajah's Institute of Medical Sciences and Hospital, Vizianagaram 535217, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Shruti KapoorDepartment of Genetics, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA.
Deepak VermaDepartment of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4699-9609
Alluri Ashok RajuMedicover Hospitals, Visakhapatnam 530022, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Manikantha DunnaCenter for Biotechnology, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Hyderabad 500085, Telangana, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9549-1954
Nethaji MunirajCenter for Cancer and Immunology Research, Children's National Hospital, 111, Michigan Ave NW, Washington, DC 20010, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3820-2148

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer persists as a global challenge necessitating continual innovation in treatment strategies. Despite significant advancements in comprehending the disease, cancer remains a leading cause of mortality worldwide, exerting substantial economic burdens on healthcare systems and societies. The emergence of drug resistance further complicates therapeutic efficacy, underscoring the urgent need for alternative approaches. Drug repurposing, characterized by the utilization of existing drugs for novel clinical applications, emerges as a promising avenue for addressing these challenges. Repurposed drugs, comprising FDA-approved (in other disease indications), generic, off-patent, and failed medications, offer distinct advantages including established safety profiles, cost-effectiveness, and expedited development timelines compared to novel drug discovery processes. Various methodologies, such as knowledge-based analyses, drug-centric strategies, and computational approaches, play pivotal roles in identifying potential candidates for repurposing. However, despite the promise of repurposed drugs, drug repositioning confronts formidable obstacles. Patenting issues, financial constraints associated with conducting extensive clinical trials, and the necessity for combination therapies to overcome the limitations of monotherapy pose significant challenges. This review provides an in-depth exploration of drug repurposing, covering a diverse array of approaches including experimental, re-engineering protein, nanotechnology, and computational methods. Each of these avenues presents distinct opportunities and obstacles in the pursuit of identifying novel clinical uses for established drugs. By examining the multifaceted landscape of drug repurposing, this review aims to offer comprehensive insights into its potential to transform cancer therapeutics.

Indexed as

cancercomputational approachesdrug repositioning combination therapiesdrug repurposingdrug resistancenanotechnologyprotein re-engineeringtherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID38672545
PMCPMC11048531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.