Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38672542›Full record

ArticleCancers2024

Predictors of Survival, Treatment Modalities, and Clinical Outcomes of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma in Patients Older Than 70 Years Still an Unmet Medical Need in 2024 Based on Real-World Evidence.

Luís Alberto de Pádua Covas Lage, Rita Novello De Vita, Lucas Bassolli de Oliveira Alves, Mayara D'Auria Jacomassi, Hebert Fabrício Culler, Cadiele Oliana Reichert, Fábio Alessandro de Freitas, Vanderson Rocha, Sheila Aparecida Coelho Siqueira, Renata de Oliveira Costa and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Luís Alberto de Pádua Covas LageDepartment of Hematology, Hemotherapy & Cell Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo (FM-USP), São Paulo 05403000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9228-3276
Rita Novello De VitaDepartment of Hematology, Hemotherapy & Cell Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo (FM-USP), São Paulo 05403000, Brazil.
Lucas Bassolli de Oliveira AlvesDepartment of Hematology, Hemotherapy & Cell Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo (FM-USP), São Paulo 05403000, Brazil.
Mayara D'Auria JacomassiDepartment of Hematology, Hemotherapy & Cell Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo (FM-USP), São Paulo 05403000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7006-9295
Hebert Fabrício CullerDepartment of Hematology, Hemotherapy & Cell Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo (FM-USP), São Paulo 05403000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6850-8247
Cadiele Oliana ReichertLaboratory of Medical Investigation in Pathogenesis and Directed Therapy in Onco-Immuno-Hematology (LIM-31), Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo (FM-USP), São Paulo 05403000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4327-3928
Fábio Alessandro de FreitasLaboratory of Medical Investigation in Pathogenesis and Directed Therapy in Onco-Immuno-Hematology (LIM-31), Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo (FM-USP), São Paulo 05403000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5745-7843
Vanderson RochaDepartment of Hematology, Hemotherapy & Cell Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo (FM-USP), São Paulo 05403000, Brazil.
Sheila Aparecida Coelho SiqueiraDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo (FM-USP), São Paulo 05403000, Brazil.
Renata de Oliveira CostaDepartment of Hematology & Hemotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, Centro Universitário Lusíada (Unilus), Santos 11045101, Brazil.
Juliana PereiraDepartment of Hematology, Hemotherapy & Cell Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo (FM-USP), São Paulo 05403000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0655-2821
Universidade de São Paulo · BRCentro Universitário Lusíada · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) especially affects the older population. Old (≥60 years) and very old age (≥80 years) DLBCL patients often present high-risk molecular alterations, lower tolerability to conventional immunochemotherapy, and poor clinical outcomes. In this scenario, attenuated therapeutic strategies, such as the R-MiniCHOP and R-MiniCHOP of the elderly regimens, have emerged for this particularly fragile population. However, the responses, clinical outcomes, and toxicities of these regimens currently remain poorly understood, mainly because these individuals are not usually included in controlled clinical trials.

methodsThis retrospective, observational, and single-center real-world study included 185 DLBCL, NOS patients older than 70 years treated at the largest oncology center in Latin America from 2009 to 2020. We aimed to assess the outcomes, determine survival predictors, and compare responses and toxicities between three different primary therapeutic strategies, including the conventional R-CHOP regimen and the attenuated R-MiniCHOP and R-MiniCHOP of the elderly protocols.

resultsThe median age at diagnosis was 75 years (70-97 years), and 58.9% were female. Comorbidities were prevalent, including 19.5% with immobility, 28.1% with malnutrition, and 24.8% with polypharmacy. Advanced clinical stage was observed in 72.4%, 48.6% had bulky disease ≥7 cm, 63.2% had B-symptoms, and 67.0% presented intermediate-high/high-risk IPI. With a median follow-up of 6.3 years, the estimated 5-year OS and PFS were 50.2% and 44.6%, respectively. The R-MiniCHOP of the elderly regimen had a lower ORR (

conclusionsIn this large and real-life Latin American cohort, we demonstrated that patients with DLBCL, NOS older than 70 years still do not have satisfactory clinical outcomes in 2024, with half of cases not reaching 5 years of life expectancy after diagnosis. Although the conventional R-CHOP offers response and survival advantages over attenuated regimens, its myelotoxicity is not negligible. Therefore, the outcomes reported and the prognostic factors here identified may assist clinicians in the appropriate selection of therapeutic strategies adapted to the risk for old and very old DLBCL patients.

Indexed as

clinical outcomesdiffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL)less intensified regimensold and very oldprognostic factorsup-front immunochemotherapy

Identifiers

PMID38672542
PMCPMC11048621
OpenAlexW4394725505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.