Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38672273›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2024

Artificial Extracellular Vesicles Generated from T Cells Using Different Induction Techniques.

Ekaterina A Zmievskaya, Sabir A Mukhametshin, Irina A Ganeeva, Elvina M Gilyazova, Elvira T Siraeva, Marianna P Kutyreva, Artur A Khannanov, Youyong Yuan, Emil R Bulatov

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Green nanomedicine for cancer therapy.Chinese medical journal · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Multiphysics-Driven Assembly of Biomimetic Vesicles.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Extracellular Vesicle-Based Drug Delivery Systems in Cancer Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Immune aging and infectious diseases.Chinese medical journal · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ekaterina A ZmievskayaInstitute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan Federal University, 420008 Kazan, Russia.
Sabir A MukhametshinInstitute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan Federal University, 420008 Kazan, Russia.ORCID 0009-0000-8687-358X
Irina A GaneevaInstitute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan Federal University, 420008 Kazan, Russia.
Elvina M GilyazovaInstitute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan Federal University, 420008 Kazan, Russia.
Elvira T SiraevaInstitute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan Federal University, 420008 Kazan, Russia.
Marianna P KutyrevaA.M. Butlerov Institute of Chemistry, Kazan Federal University, 420008 Kazan, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-6674-8685
Artur A KhannanovA.M. Butlerov Institute of Chemistry, Kazan Federal University, 420008 Kazan, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-5119-8449
Youyong YuanSchool of Biomedical Sciences and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou International Campus, Guangzhou 511442, China.
Emil R BulatovInstitute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan Federal University, 420008 Kazan, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-2961-0032
Kazan Federal University · RUSouth China University of Technology · CN

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 23-24-00224
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell therapy is at the forefront of biomedicine in oncology and regenerative medicine. However, there are still significant challenges to their wider clinical application such as limited efficacy, side effects, and logistical difficulties. One of the potential approaches that could overcome these problems is based on extracellular vesicles (EVs) as a cell-free therapy modality. One of the major obstacles in the translation of EVs into practice is their low yield of production, which is insufficient to achieve therapeutic amounts. Here, we evaluated two primary approaches of artificial vesicle induction in primary T cells and the SupT1 cell line-cytochalasin B as a chemical inducer and ultrasonication as a physical inducer. We found that both methods are capable of producing artificial vesicles, but cytochalasin B induction leads to vesicle yield compared to natural secretion, while ultrasonication leads to a three-fold increase in particle yield. Cytochalasin B induces the formation of vesicles full of cytoplasmic compartments without nuclear fraction, while ultrasonication induces the formation of particles rich in membranes and membrane-related components such as CD3 or HLAII proteins. The most effective approach for T-cell induction in terms of the number of vesicles seems to be the combination of anti-CD3/CD28 antibody activation with ultrasonication, which leads to a seven-fold yield increase in particles with a high content of functionally important proteins (CD3, granzyme B, and HLA II).

Indexed as

artificial vesiclesextracellular vesiclesT cellsultrasonicationvesicle induction

Identifiers

PMID38672273
PMCPMC11048032
OpenAlexW4395012432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.