Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38672157›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2024

Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury: Unraveling Pathophysiology, Clinical Manifestations, and Emerging Prevention Strategies.

Marios Sagris, Anastasios Apostolos, Panagiotis Theofilis, Nikolaos Ktenopoulos, Odysseas Katsaros, Sotirios Tsalamandris, Konstantinos Tsioufis, Konstantinos Toutouzas, Dimitris Tousoulis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marios Sagris1st Cardiology Clinic, 'Hippokration' General Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-3473-1368
Anastasios Apostolos1st Cardiology Clinic, 'Hippokration' General Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-2616-7952
Panagiotis Theofilis1st Cardiology Clinic, 'Hippokration' General Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-9260-6306
Nikolaos Ktenopoulos1st Cardiology Clinic, 'Hippokration' General Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-0995-7015
Odysseas Katsaros1st Cardiology Clinic, 'Hippokration' General Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-7684-3245
Sotirios Tsalamandris1st Cardiology Clinic, 'Hippokration' General Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.
Konstantinos Tsioufis1st Cardiology Clinic, 'Hippokration' General Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.
Konstantinos Toutouzas1st Cardiology Clinic, 'Hippokration' General Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.
Dimitris Tousoulis1st Cardiology Clinic, 'Hippokration' General Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury (MIRI) remains a challenge in the context of reperfusion procedures for myocardial infarction (MI). While early revascularization stands as the gold standard for mitigating myocardial injury, recent insights have illuminated the paradoxical role of reperfusion, giving rise to the phenomenon known as ischemia-reperfusion injury. This comprehensive review delves into the intricate pathophysiological pathways involved in MIRI, placing a particular focus on the pivotal role of endothelium. Beyond elucidating the molecular intricacies, we explore the diverse clinical manifestations associated with MIRI, underscoring its potential to contribute substantially to the final infarct size, up to 50%. We further navigate through current preventive approaches and highlight promising emerging strategies designed to counteract the devastating effects of the phenomenon. By synthesizing current knowledge and offering a perspective on evolving preventive interventions, this review serves as a valuable resource for clinicians and researchers engaged in the dynamic field of MIRI.

Indexed as

clinical implicationsendotheliummyocardial infarctionmyocardial ischemia–reperfusion injurypathophysiologypreventiontreatment

Identifiers

PMID38672157
PMCPMC11048318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.