Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38672025›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2024

Sensorimotor Network Segregation Predicts Long-Term Learning of Writing Skills in Parkinson's Disease.

Nicholas D'Cruz, Joni De Vleeschhauwer, Martina Putzolu, Evelien Nackaerts, Moran Gilat, Alice Nieuwboer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicholas D'CruzResearch Group for Neurorehabilitation (eNRGy), Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Tervuursevest 101, Box 1500, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5306-5903
Joni De VleeschhauwerResearch Group for Neurorehabilitation (eNRGy), Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Tervuursevest 101, Box 1500, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium.
Martina PutzoluDepartment of Experimental Medicine (DIMES), Section of Human Physiology, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8972-9188
Evelien NackaertsResearch Group for Neurorehabilitation (eNRGy), Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Tervuursevest 101, Box 1500, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium.
Moran GilatResearch Group for Neurorehabilitation (eNRGy), Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Tervuursevest 101, Box 1500, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium.
Alice NieuwboerResearch Group for Neurorehabilitation (eNRGy), Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Tervuursevest 101, Box 1500, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium.
KU Leuven · BEUniversity of Genoa · IT

Funding

Research Foundation - Flanders G.0906.11
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prediction of motor learning in Parkinson's disease (PD) is vastly understudied. Here, we investigated which clinical and neural factors predict better long-term gains after an intensive 6-week motor learning program to ameliorate micrographia. We computed a composite score of learning through principal component analysis, reflecting better writing accuracy on a tablet in single and dual task conditions. Three endpoints were studied-acquisition (pre- to post-training), retention (post-training to 6-week follow-up), and overall learning (acquisition plus retention). Baseline writing, clinical characteristics, as well as resting-state network segregation were used as predictors. We included 28 patients with PD (13 freezers and 15 non-freezers), with an average disease duration of 7 (±3.9) years. We found that worse baseline writing accuracy predicted larger gains for acquisition and overall learning. After correcting for baseline writing accuracy, we found female sex to predict better acquisition, and shorter disease duration to help retention. Additionally, absence of FOG, less severe motor symptoms, female sex, better unimanual dexterity, and better sensorimotor network segregation impacted overall learning positively. Importantly, three factors were retained in a multivariable model predicting overall learning, namely baseline accuracy, female sex, and sensorimotor network segregation. Besides the room to improve and female sex, sensorimotor network segregation seems to be a valuable measure to predict long-term motor learning potential in PD.

Indexed as

micrographiamotor learningnetwork segregationParkinson’s diseaseprediction modelrehabilitationresting-state fMRI

Identifiers

PMID38672025
PMCPMC11047850
OpenAlexW4394768016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.