Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38672010›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2024

How Lifetime Evolution of Parkinson's Disease Could Shape Clinical Trial Design: A Shared Patient-Clinician Viewpoint.

Jules M Janssen Daalen, Aranka Gerritsen, Gijs Gerritse, Jan Gouman, Hannie Meijerink, Leny E Rietdijk, Sirwan K L Darweesh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jules M Janssen DaalenRadboud University Medical Center, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Department of Neurology, Center of Expertise for Parkinson & Movement Disorders, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6290-5882
Aranka GerritsenRadboud University Medical Center, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Department of Neurology, Center of Expertise for Parkinson & Movement Disorders, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Gijs GerritseDutch Parkinson's Patient Association, P.O. Box 46, 3980 CA Bunnik, The Netherlands.
Jan GoumanDutch Parkinson's Patient Association, P.O. Box 46, 3980 CA Bunnik, The Netherlands.
Hannie MeijerinkDutch Parkinson's Patient Association, P.O. Box 46, 3980 CA Bunnik, The Netherlands.
Leny E RietdijkDutch Parkinson's Patient Association, P.O. Box 46, 3980 CA Bunnik, The Netherlands.
Sirwan K L DarweeshRadboud University Medical Center, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Department of Neurology, Center of Expertise for Parkinson & Movement Disorders, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4361-4593

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parkinson's disease (PD) has a long, heterogeneous, pre-diagnostic phase, during which pathology insidiously accumulates. Increasing evidence suggests that environmental and lifestyle factors in early life contribute to disease risk and progression. Thanks to the extensive study of this pre-diagnostic phase, the first prevention trials of PD are being designed. However, the highly heterogenous evolution of the disease across the life course is not yet sufficiently taken into account. This could hamper clinical trial success in the advent of biological disease definitions. In an interdisciplinary patient-clinician study group, we discussed how an approach that incorporates the lifetime evolution of PD may benefit the design of disease-modifying trials by impacting population, target and outcome selection. We argue that the timepoint of exposure to risk and protective factors plays a critical role in PD subtypes, influencing population selection. In addition, recent developments in differential disease mechanisms, aided by biological disease definitions, could impact optimal treatment targets. Finally, multimodal biomarker panels using this lifetime approach will likely be most sensitive as progression markers for more personalized trials. We believe that the lifetime evolution of PD should be considered in the design of clinical trials, and that such initiatives could benefit from more patient-clinician partnerships.

Indexed as

disease-modifying treatmentlifetime researchParkinson’s diseasepatient–clinician collaboration

Identifiers

PMID38672010
PMCPMC11048137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.