Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38671813›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Evaluation of Deep Learning Model Architectures for Point-of-Care Ultrasound Diagnostics.

Sofia I Hernandez Torres, Austin Ruiz, Lawrence Holland, Ryan Ortiz, Eric J Snider

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sofia I Hernandez TorresOrgan Support and Automation Technologies Group, U.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research, Joint Base San Antonio, Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX 78234, USA.
Austin RuizOrgan Support and Automation Technologies Group, U.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research, Joint Base San Antonio, Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX 78234, USA.
Lawrence HollandOrgan Support and Automation Technologies Group, U.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research, Joint Base San Antonio, Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX 78234, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0210-6856
Ryan OrtizOrgan Support and Automation Technologies Group, U.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research, Joint Base San Antonio, Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX 78234, USA.
Eric J SniderOrgan Support and Automation Technologies Group, U.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research, Joint Base San Antonio, Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX 78234, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0293-4937
United States Army Institute of Surgical Research · US

Funding

Oak Ridge Associated Universities N/AUnited States Department of Defense IS220007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Point-of-care ultrasound imaging is a critical tool for patient triage during trauma for diagnosing injuries and prioritizing limited medical evacuation resources. Specifically, an eFAST exam evaluates if there are free fluids in the chest or abdomen but this is only possible if ultrasound scans can be accurately interpreted, a challenge in the pre-hospital setting. In this effort, we evaluated the use of artificial intelligent eFAST image interpretation models. Widely used deep learning model architectures were evaluated as well as Bayesian models optimized for six different diagnostic models: pneumothorax (i) B- or (ii) M-mode, hemothorax (iii) B- or (iv) M-mode, (v) pelvic or bladder abdominal hemorrhage and (vi) right upper quadrant abdominal hemorrhage. Models were trained using images captured in 27 swine. Using a leave-one-subject-out training approach, the MobileNetV2 and DarkNet53 models surpassed 85% accuracy for each M-mode scan site. The different B-mode models performed worse with accuracies between 68% and 74% except for the pelvic hemorrhage model, which only reached 62% accuracy for all model architectures. These results highlight which eFAST scan sites can be easily automated with image interpretation models, while other scan sites, such as the bladder hemorrhage model, will require more robust model development or data augmentation to improve performance. With these additional improvements, the skill threshold for ultrasound-based triage can be reduced, thus expanding its utility in the pre-hospital setting.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningimage interpretationmedical imagingmedical triageultrasound imaging

Identifiers

PMID38671813
PMCPMC11048259
OpenAlexW4394913110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.