Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38671795›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Automatic Segmentation of Bone Marrow Lesions on MRI Using a Deep Learning Method.

Raj Ponnusamy, Ming Zhang, Yue Wang, Xinyue Sun, Mohammad Chowdhury, Jeffrey B Driban, Timothy McAlindon, Juan Shan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Diffusion cycle-consistent generative adversarial networks for pelvic active bone marrow segmentation].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Raj PonnusamyDepartment of Computer Science, Seidenberg School of CSIS, Pace University, New York City, NY 10038, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6284-9312
Ming ZhangDepartment of Computer Science, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Yue WangDepartment of Computer Science, Seidenberg School of CSIS, Pace University, New York City, NY 10038, USA.
Xinyue SunSchool of Electronic Information and Electrical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China.
Mohammad ChowdhuryDepartment of Computer Science, Seidenberg School of CSIS, Pace University, New York City, NY 10038, USA.
Jeffrey B DribanDepartment of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655, USA.
Timothy McAlindonDivision of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA 02111, USA.
Juan ShanDepartment of Computer Science, Seidenberg School of CSIS, Pace University, New York City, NY 10038, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2718-3164
Pace University · USBoston University · USShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNTufts Medical Center · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone marrow lesion (BML) volume is a potential biomarker of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) as it is associated with cartilage degeneration and pain. However, segmenting and quantifying the BML volume is challenging due to the small size, low contrast, and various positions where the BML may occur. It is also time-consuming to delineate BMLs manually. In this paper, we proposed a fully automatic segmentation method for BMLs without requiring human intervention. The model takes intermediate weighted fat-suppressed (IWFS) magnetic resonance (MR) images as input, and the output BML masks are evaluated using both regular 2D Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of the slice-level area metric and 3D DSC of the subject-level volume metric. On a dataset with 300 subjects, each subject has a sequence of 36 IWFS MR images approximately. We randomly separated the dataset into training, validation, and testing sets with a 70%/15%/15% split at the subject level. Since not every subject or image has a BML, we excluded the images without a BML in each subset. The ground truth of the BML was labeled by trained medical staff using a semi-automatic tool. Compared with the ground truth, the proposed segmentation method achieved a Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.98 between the manually measured volumes and automatically segmented volumes, a 2D DSC of 0.68, and a 3D DSC of 0.60 on the testing set. Although the DSC result is not high, the high correlation of 0.98 indicates that the automatically measured BML volume is strongly correlated with the manually measured BML volume, which shows the potential to use the proposed method as an automatic measurement tool for the BML biomarker to facilitate the assessment of knee OA progression.

Indexed as

bone marrow lesionscomputer-aided diagnosisdeep learningknee osteoarthritissegmentation

Identifiers

PMID38671795
PMCPMC11048083
OpenAlexW4394780011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.