Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38671789›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Fetal Heart Rate Preprocessing Techniques: A Scoping Review.

Inês Campos, Hernâni Gonçalves, João Bernardes, Luísa Castro

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Inês CamposFaculty of Engineering, University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal.
Hernâni GonçalvesCenter for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS@RISE), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-6558-8966
João BernardesCenter for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS@RISE), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal.
Luísa CastroCenter for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS@RISE), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-1312-0154
Universidade do Porto · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monitoring fetal heart rate (FHR) through cardiotocography is crucial for the early diagnosis of fetal distress situations, necessitating prompt obstetrical intervention. However, FHR signals are often marred by various contaminants, making preprocessing techniques essential for accurate analysis. This scoping review, following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, describes the preprocessing methods in original research articles on human FHR (or beat-to-beat intervals) signal preprocessing from PubMed and Web of Science, published from their inception up to May 2021. From the 322 unique articles identified, 54 were included, from which prevalent preprocessing approaches were identified, primarily focusing on the detection and correction of poor signal quality events. Detection usually entailed analyzing deviations from neighboring samples, whereas correction often relied on interpolation techniques. It was also noted that there is a lack of consensus regarding the definition of missing samples, outliers, and artifacts. Trends indicate a surge in research interest in the decade 2011-2021. This review underscores the need for standardizing FHR signal preprocessing techniques to enhance diagnostic accuracy. Future work should focus on applying and evaluating these methods across FHR databases aiming to assess their effectiveness and propose improvements.

Indexed as

artifactscardiotocographyfetal heart ratematernal–fetal ambiguitymissing samplespreprocessing

Identifiers

PMID38671789
PMCPMC11048563
OpenAlexW4394764395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.