ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Nerve Reconstruction Using ActiGraft Blood Clot in Rabbit Acute Peripheral Injury Model: Preliminary Study.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative analysis of Antigliotic Guiding Regenerative Gel (AGRG - LDP-916) for peripheral nerve reconstruction: Evidence from prospective randomized controlled studies.Brain & spine · 2026Review
- The Influence of a Predegenerated Autological Nerve Graft on the Results of Peripheral Nerve Repair in the Upper Extremities After Injuries.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
This preliminary study aimed to investigate an ActiGraft blood clot implant (RedDress Ltd., Pardes-Hanna, Israel) attempting to treat and induce the regeneration of a completely injured peripheral nerve with a massive loss defect. The tibial portion of the sciatic nerve in 11 rabbits was transected, and a 25 mm nerve gap was reconnected using a collagen tube. A comparison was performed between the treatment group (eight rabbits; reconnection using a tube filled with ActiGraft blood clot) and the control group (three rabbits; gap reconnection using an empty tube). The post-operative follow-up period lasted 18 weeks and included electrophysiological and histochemical assessments. The pathological severity score was high in the tube cross sections of the control group (1.33) compared to the ActiGraft blood clot treatment group (0.63). Morphometric analysis showed a higher percentage of the positive myelin basic protein (MBP) stained area in the ActiGraft blood clot group (19.57%) versus the control group (3.67%). These differences were not statistically significant due to the small group sizes and the large intra-group variability. The results of this preliminary study suggest that the application of an ActiGraft blood clot (into the collagen tube) can enable nerve recovery. However, a future study using a larger animal group is required to achieve objective statistical results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.