Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38671637›Full record

ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Exploring the Diagnostic Spectrum of Children with Raised Faecal Calprotectin Levels.

Angharad Vernon-Roberts, Olivia Humphrey, Andrew S Day

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Angharad Vernon-RobertsDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch 8011, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-9402-4959
Olivia HumphreyChristchurch Hospital, Te Whatu Ora Waitaha Canterbury, Christchurch 8011, New Zealand.ORCID 0009-0008-2080-3923
Andrew S DayDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch 8011, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-2290-7386
University of Otago · NZChristchurch Hospital · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Faecal calprotectin (FC) is a marker of gut inflammation. The cause and relevance of raised FC in children outside the context of established inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have had minimal attention. This study aimed to address this by carrying out a retrospective study on children with abnormal FC tests aged 4-17 years without established IBD in the South Island, New Zealand. Abnormal FC results were stratified: 51-249 μg/g, 250-499 μg/g, and 500+ μg/g, and participants were categorised into diagnostic groups. Data were collected on symptoms and diagnostic tests. Three-hundred and ten children had abnormal index FC results, with a mean age of 12.9 years, and a 55% proportion of females. The median FC was 125 μg/g; 71% had levels 51-249 μg/g and 21% had levels 500+ μg/g. Of those with FC 500+ μg/g, 89% either had infectious diarrhoea or were diagnosed with IBD at the time of, or subsequent to, the index FC. Alarm symptoms did not delineate between groups with FC 500+ μg/g. Abnormalities in platelet levels, abdominal ultrasound, and colonoscopy were more frequent for children diagnosed with IBD. Repeat FC test levels were significantly reduced except for those subsequently diagnosed with IBD. Abnormal FC levels for the majority were below the level indicative of mucosal inflammation. Repeat FC testing could play an important role in distinguishing between diagnoses.

Indexed as

alarm symptomscalprotectinchildrendiagnostic

Identifiers

PMID38671637
PMCPMC11049439
OpenAlexW4393439003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.