Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38671602›Full record

ReviewChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Clear Aligners in the Growing Patient: A Systematic Review.

Alessio Danilo Inchingolo, Gianna Dipalma, Irene Ferrara, Fabio Viapiano, Anna Netti, Anna Maria Ciocia, Antonio Mancini, Giuseppina Malcangi, Andrea Palermo, Angelo Michele Inchingolo and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Effects of AMCOPJournal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alessio Danilo InchingoloDepartment of Interdisciplinary Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6366-1039
Gianna DipalmaDepartment of Interdisciplinary Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5947-8987
Irene FerraraDepartment of Interdisciplinary Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.
Fabio ViapianoDepartment of Interdisciplinary Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.
Anna NettiDepartment of Interdisciplinary Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2215-0881
Anna Maria CiociaDepartment of Interdisciplinary Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7096-8189
Antonio ManciniDepartment of Interdisciplinary Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.
Giuseppina MalcangiDepartment of Interdisciplinary Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9745-7506
Andrea PalermoCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, Birmingham B4 6BN, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3288-490X
Angelo Michele InchingoloDepartment of Interdisciplinary Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.
Francesco InchingoloDepartment of Interdisciplinary Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3797-5883

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mixed dentition represents a critical phase in the oral development of pediatric patients, characterized by the simultaneous presence of primary and permanent teeth. This article proposes a comprehensive systematic review of the application of aligners as an innovative methodology in managing mixed dentition. The primary objective is to explore the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of this emerging orthodontic technology in the evolving age group. This systematic review focuses on randomized controlled trials, cohorts, and observational studies investigating the use of aligners in patients with mixed dentition. Clinical, radiographic, and psychosocial parameters will be considered to assess the overall impact of aligner therapy in this critical phase of dental development. An in-depth analysis of such data aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the potential of this technology in pediatric orthodontics. Expected outcomes may contribute to outlining practical guidelines and targeted therapeutic strategies for orthodontists involved in managing mixed dentition. Furthermore, this article aims to identify gaps in the current research and suggest future directions for studies exploring the use of transparent aligners in patients with mixed dentition, thereby contributing to the ongoing evolution of evidence-based orthodontic practices.

Indexed as

acceptability of alignersaestheticarch form developmentclass II malocclusionclear aligner treatmentgingival morphologygrowing patientsmalocclusionmucogingival modificationstransverse discrepancies

Identifiers

PMID38671602
PMCPMC11049164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.