Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38671544›Full record

ArticleAddiction science & clinical practice2024

Training health professionals to reduce overreporting of birthing people who use drugs to child welfare.

Sarah C M Roberts, Kimá Joy Taylor, Karen Alexander, Daisy Goodman, Noelle Martinez, Mishka Terplan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction science & clinical practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. County-Level Pregnancy Criminalization Rates and Prenatal Care Initiation and Utilization in Alabama, 2014-2022.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sarah C M RobertsDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, Oakland, CA, 94612, USA. Sarah.Roberts@ucsf.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7732-4607
Kimá Joy TaylorAnka Consulting, LLC., Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Karen AlexanderFriends Research Institute, 1040 Park Ave., Suite 103, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
Daisy GoodmanGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, 1 Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
Noelle MartinezVA San Diego Healthcare System, 3350 La Jolla Village Drive, San Diego, CA, 92161, USA.
Mishka TerplanFriends Research Institute, 1040 Park Ave., Suite 103, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth care providers are a key source of reports of infants to child welfare related to birthing people's substance use. Many of these reports are overreports, or reports that exceed what is legally mandated, and reflect racial bias. We developed and evaluated a webinar for health professionals to address overreporting related to birthing people's substance use.

methodsThis evaluation study collected data from health professionals registering to participate in a professional education webinar about pregnancy, substance use, and child welfare reporting. It collected baseline data upon webinar registration, immediate post-webinar data, and 6 month follow-up data. Differences in both pre-post-and 6 month follow-up data were used to examine changes from before to after the webinars in beliefs, attitudes, and practices related to pregnant and birthing people who use drugs and child welfare reporting.

results592 nurses, social workers, physicians, public health professionals, and other health professionals completed the baseline survey. More than half of those completing the baseline survey (n = 307, 52%) completed one or both follow-up surveys. We observed statistically significant changes in five of the eleven opioid attitudes/beliefs and in four of the nine child welfare attitudes/beliefs from baseline to follow-ups, and few changes in "control statements," i.e. beliefs we did not expect to change based on webinar participation. All of the changes were in the direction of less support for child welfare reporting. In particular, the proportion agreeing with the main evaluation outcome of "I would rather err on the side of overreporting to child welfare than underreporting to child welfare" decreased from 41% at baseline to 28% and 31% post-webinar and at 6-month follow up (p = 0.001). In addition, fewer participants endorsed reporting everyone at the 6 month follow-up than at baseline (12% to 22%) and more participants endorsed reporting no one at the 6-month follow-up than at baseline (28% to 18%), p = 0.013.

conclusionsWebinars on the legal, scientific, and ethical aspects of reporting that are co-developed with people with lived experience may be a path to reducing health professional overreporting to child welfare related to birthing people's substance use.

Indexed as

Child WelfareHealth PersonnelAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelChildFemaleHumansInfantMaleMandatory ReportingPregnancySubstance-Related DisordersBirth historyChild welfareOpioidParentingSubstance use disorder

Identifiers

PMID38671544
PMCPMC11046794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.