Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38671513›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2024

Healthcare insurance fraud detection using data mining.

Zain Hamid, Fatima Khalique, Saba Mahmood, Ali Daud, Amal Bukhari, Bader Alshemaimri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Anomaly-based threat detection in smart health using machine learning.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zain Hamid *Department of Computer Science, Bahria University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Fatima Khalique *Department of Computer Science, Bahria University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Saba Mahmood *Department of Computer Science, Bahria University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Ali Daud *Faculty of Resilience, Rabdan Academy, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. alimsdb@gmail.com.
Amal Bukhari *Department of Information Systems and Technology, College of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Bader Alshemaimri *Software Engineering Department, College of Computing and Information Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealthcare programs and insurance initiatives play a crucial role in ensuring that people have access to medical care. There are many benefits of healthcare insurance programs but fraud in healthcare continues to be a significant challenge in the insurance industry. Healthcare insurance fraud detection faces challenges from evolving and sophisticated fraud schemes that adapt to detection methods. Analyzing extensive healthcare data is hindered by complexity, data quality issues, and the need for real-time detection, while privacy concerns and false positives pose additional hurdles. The lack of standardization in coding and limited resources further complicate efforts to address fraudulent activities effectively. METHODOLGY: In this study, a fraud detection methodology is presented that utilizes association rule mining augmented with unsupervised learning techniques to detect healthcare insurance fraud. Dataset from the Centres for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) 2008-2010 DE-SynPUF is used for analysis. The proposed methodology works in two stages. First, association rule mining is used to extract frequent rules from the transactions based on patient, service and service provider features. Second, the extracted rules are passed to unsupervised classifiers, such as IF, CBLOF, ECOD, and OCSVM, to identify fraudulent activity.

resultsDescriptive analysis shows patterns and trends in the data revealing interesting relationship among diagnosis codes, procedure codes and the physicians. The baseline anomaly detection algorithms generated results in 902.24 seconds. Another experiment retrieved frequent rules using association rule mining with apriori algorithm combined with unsupervised techniques in 868.18 seconds. The silhouette scoring method calculated the efficacy of four different anomaly detection techniques showing CBLOF with highest score of 0.114 followed by isolation forest with the score of 0.103. The ECOD and OCSVM techniques have lower scores of 0.063 and 0.060, respectively.

conclusionThe proposed methodology enhances healthcare insurance fraud detection by using association rule mining for pattern discovery and unsupervised classifiers for effective anomaly detection.

Indexed as

Data MiningFraudInsurance, HealthHumansUnited StatesAssociation rules mining techniquesHealthcare insuranceHealthcare insurance fraudsUnsupervised learning

Identifiers

PMID38671513
PMCPMC11046758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.