Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38671496›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2024

Predictive factors and risk and protection groups for loneliness in older adults: a population-based study.

Pedro Montejo Carrasco, David Prada Crespo, Ana Isabel Reinoso García, Monserrat Lozano Ibáñez, Borja Montejo Rubio, Mercedes Montenegro-Peña

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Temporal patterns of loneliness and their associations with mental health outcomes: Observations from a longitudinal study.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pedro Montejo CarrascoCentre for the Prevention of Cognitive Impairment, Madrid Salud, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3028-0184
David Prada CrespoDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Complutense University of Madrid (UCM), Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1945-5235
Ana Isabel Reinoso GarcíaCentre for the Prevention of Cognitive Impairment, Madrid Salud, Madrid, Spain.
Monserrat Lozano IbáñezCentre for the Prevention of Cognitive Impairment, Madrid Salud, Madrid, Spain.
Borja Montejo RubioRamón y Cajal University Hospital of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7653-172X
Mercedes Montenegro-PeñaCentre for the Prevention of Cognitive Impairment, Madrid Salud, Madrid, Spain. mercedesmontenegro@psi.ucm.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0264-7329

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLoneliness is considered a public health problem, particularly among older adults. Although risk factors for loneliness have been studied extensively, fewer studies have focused on the protected and risk groups that these factors configure. Our objective is to analyze the variables and latent factors that predict loneliness in older adults and that enable risk and protected groups to be configured.

methodsWe employed an epidemiological, cross-sectional survey that was carried out on a random sample of 2060 people over 65 years extracted from the census. A structured telephone interview was used to assess mental and physical health, habits, quality of life, and loneliness, applying the COOP-Wonca, Goldberg General Health (GHQ-12), and Barber Questionnaires.

resultsPredictors of loneliness were: mental health, living alone, quality of life, depressive symptoms, low educational level, and some deficiency situations such as having no one to turn to for help. The factors extracted (Factorial Analysis) were: a subjective experience of poor health, objective isolation, and psychological isolation. We established at risk and protected groups ("Decision Tree" procedure), and loneliness was referred to by 73.2% of the people living alone and with poor mental health and quality of life (risk group). By contrast, only 0.8% of people living with others, with good mental health and good quality of life felt loneliness (protected group).

conclusionIn a well-developed city, subjective and objective factors are associated with loneliness. These factors, especially those associated with at risk or protected groups, must be considered to develop strategies that address loneliness.

Indexed as

LonelinessQuality of LifeAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionFemaleHealth StatusHumansMaleMental HealthRisk FactorsSocial IsolationSurveys and QuestionnairesAgeingDepressionLiving aloneLonelinessMental healthProtective factorsQuality of lifeRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID38671496
PMCPMC11055238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.