Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38671440›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2024

Culture change and lessons learned from ten years in the VA centers of excellence in primary care education.

William G Weppner, Mamta K Singh, Joyce E Wipf, Rebecca Shunk, LeChauncy Woodard, Rebecca Brienza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

William G WeppnerDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA. william.weppner@va.gov.
Mamta K SinghPrimary Care Service, VA Northeast Ohio Health Care System, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Joyce E WipfDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Rebecca ShunkDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
LeChauncy WoodardTilman J. Fertitta Family College of Medicine, Humana Integrated Health System Sciences Institute, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Rebecca BrienzaDivision of General Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, West Haven, CT, USA.

Funding

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Centers of Excellence in Primary Care Education
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTeam-based care is critical to achieving health care value while maximizing patient outcomes. Few descriptions exist of graduate-level team training interventions and practice models. Experience from the multisite, decade-long Veterans Affairs (VA) Centers of Excellence in Primary Care Education provides lessons for developing internal medicine training experiences in interprofessional clinical learning environments.

methodsA review of multisite demonstration project transforming traditional silo-model training to interprofessional team-based primary care. Using iterative quality improvement approaches, sites evaluated curricula with learner, faculty and staff feedback. Learner- and patient-level outcomes and organizational culture change were examined using mixed methods, within and across sites. Participants included more than 1600 internal medicine, nurse practitioner, nursing, pharmacy, psychology, social work and physical therapy trainees. This took place in seven academic university-affiliated VA primary care clinics with patient centered medical home design

resultsEach site developed innovative design and curricula using common competencies of shared decision making, sustained relationships, performance improvement and interprofessional collaboration. Educational strategies included integrated didactics, workplace collaboration and reflection. Sites shared implementation best practices and outcomes. Cross-site evaluations of the impacts of these educational strategies indicated improvements in trainee clinical knowledge, team-based approaches to care and interest in primary care careers. Improved patient outcomes were seen in the quality of chronic disease management, reduction in polypharmacy, and reduced emergency department and hospitalizations. Evaluations of the culture of training environments demonstrated incorporation and persistence of interprofessional learning and collaboration.

conclusionsAligning education and practice goals with cross-site collaboration created a robust interprofessional learning environment. Improved trainee/staff satisfaction and better patient care metrics supports use of this model to transform ambulatory care training.

trial registrationThis evaluation was categorized as an operation improvement activity by the Office of Academic Affairs based on Veterans Health Administration Handbook 1058.05, in which information generated is used for business operations and quality improvement (Title 38 Code of Federal Regulations Part 16 (38 CFR 16.102(l)). The overall project was subject to administrative oversight rather Human Subjects Institutional Review Board, as such informed consent was waived as part of the project implementation and evaluation.

Indexed as

CurriculumOrganizational CulturePrimary Health CareUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsHospitals, VeteransHumansInternal MedicineOrganizational InnovationPatient Care TeamPatient-Centered CareQuality ImprovementUnited StatesCenters of excellence in primary care educationCollaborative practiceInterprofessional educationPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID38671440
PMCPMC11047004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.