Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38671365›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2024

A practical approach to screening for carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales- views of a group of multidisciplinary experts from English hospitals.

D R Jenkins, C Auckland, C Chadwick, A R Dodgson, D A Enoch, S D Goldenberg, A Hussain, J Martin, E Spooner, T Whalley

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

D R JenkinsUniversity Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK. david.jenkins@uhl-tr.nhs.uk.
C AucklandRoyal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK.
C ChadwickBradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.
A R DodgsonManchester University NHS FT, Manchester, UK.
D A EnochCambridge University NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
S D GoldenbergCentre for Clinical Infection and Diagnostics Research, Guy's and Saint Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK.
A HussainUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, West Midlands, UK.
J MartinLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
E SpoonerRoyal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK.
T WhalleyLancashire & South Cumbria ICB, Preston, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCarbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) are an important public health threat, with costly operational and economic consequences for NHS Integrated Care Systems and NHS Trusts. UK Health Security Agency guidelines recommend that Trusts use locally developed risk assessments to accurately identify high-risk individuals for screening, and implement the most appropriate method of testing, but this presents many challenges.

methodsA convenience sample of cross-specialty experts from across England met to discuss the barriers and practical solutions to implementing UK Health Security Agency framework into operational and clinical workflows. The group derived responses to six key questions that are frequently asked about screening for CPE. KEY

findingsFour patient groups were identified for CPE screening: high-risk unplanned admissions, high-risk elective admissions, patients in high-risk units, and known positive contacts. Rapid molecular testing is a preferred screening method for some of these settings, offering faster turnaround times and more accurate results than culture-based testing. It is important to stimulate action now, as several lessons can be learnt from screening during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as from CPE outbreaks.

conclusionFurther decisive and instructive information is needed to establish CPE screening protocols based on local epidemiology and risk factors. Local management should continually evaluate local epidemiology, analysing data and undertaking frequent prevalence studies to understand risks, and prepare resources- such as upscaled screening- to prevent increasing prevalence, clusters or outbreaks. Rapid molecular-based methods will be a crucial part of these considerations, as they can reduce unnecessary isolation and opportunity costs.

Indexed as

Bacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasesEnterobacteriaceae InfectionsMass ScreeningCarbapenem-Resistant EnterobacteriaceaeCOVID-19EnglandEnterobacteriaceaeHospitalsHumansSARS-CoV-2Bacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasescarbapenemaseAntimicrobial resistanceCarbapenemase-producing enterobacteralesGuidanceHealthcare legislationPublic healthRoundtable meeting

Identifiers

PMID38671365
PMCPMC11046869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.