Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38671336›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2024

UViT-Seg: An Efficient ViT and U-Net-Based Framework for Accurate Colorectal Polyp Segmentation in Colonoscopy and WCE Images.

Yassine Oukdach, Anass Garbaz, Zakaria Kerkaou, Mohamed El Ansari, Lahcen Koutti, Ahmed Fouad El Ouafdi, Mouna Salihoun

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. [Review of application of U-Net and Transformer in colon polyp image segmentation].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yassine OukdachLabSIV, Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Sciences, Ibnou Zohr University, Agadir, 80000, Morocco. yassine.oukdach@edu.uiz.ac.ma.
Anass GarbazLabSIV, Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Sciences, Ibnou Zohr University, Agadir, 80000, Morocco.
Zakaria KerkaouLabSIV, Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Sciences, Ibnou Zohr University, Agadir, 80000, Morocco.
Mohamed El AnsariInformatics and Applications Laboratory, Department of Computer Sciences, Faculty of Science, Moulay Ismail University, B.P 11201, Meknès, 52000, Morocco.
Lahcen KouttiLabSIV, Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Sciences, Ibnou Zohr University, Agadir, 80000, Morocco.
Ahmed Fouad El OuafdiLabSIV, Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Sciences, Ibnou Zohr University, Agadir, 80000, Morocco.
Mouna SalihounFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy of Rabat, Mohammed V University of Rabat, Rabat, 10000, Morocco.
Université Ibn Zohr · MAMohammed V University · MA

Funding

Ministère de l'Education Nationale, de la Formation professionnelle, de l'Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche Scientifique ALKHAWARIZMI/2020/20
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) stands out as one of the most prevalent global cancers. The accurate localization of colorectal polyps in endoscopy images is pivotal for timely detection and removal, contributing significantly to CRC prevention. The manual analysis of images generated by gastrointestinal screening technologies poses a tedious task for doctors. Therefore, computer vision-assisted cancer detection could serve as an efficient tool for polyp segmentation. Numerous efforts have been dedicated to automating polyp localization, with the majority of studies relying on convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to learn features from polyp images. Despite their success in polyp segmentation tasks, CNNs exhibit significant limitations in precisely determining polyp location and shape due to their sole reliance on learning local features from images. While gastrointestinal images manifest significant variation in their features, encompassing both high- and low-level ones, a framework that combines the ability to learn both features of polyps is desired. This paper introduces UViT-Seg, a framework designed for polyp segmentation in gastrointestinal images. Operating on an encoder-decoder architecture, UViT-Seg employs two distinct feature extraction methods. A vision transformer in the encoder section captures long-range semantic information, while a CNN module, integrating squeeze-excitation and dual attention mechanisms, captures low-level features, focusing on critical image regions. Experimental evaluations conducted on five public datasets, including CVC clinic, ColonDB, Kvasir-SEG, ETIS LaribDB, and Kvasir Capsule-SEG, demonstrate UViT-Seg's effectiveness in polyp localization. To confirm its generalization performance, the model is tested on datasets not used in training. Benchmarking against common segmentation methods and state-of-the-art polyp segmentation approaches, the proposed model yields promising results. For instance, it achieves a mean Dice coefficient of 0.915 and a mean intersection over union of 0.902 on the CVC Colon dataset. Furthermore, UViT-Seg has the advantage of being efficient, requiring fewer computational resources for both training and testing. This feature positions it as an optimal choice for real-world deployment scenarios.

Indexed as

Colonic PolypsColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImage Processing, Computer-AssistedAttention mechanismCNNColorectal cancerPolyp localizationVision transformer

Identifiers

PMID38671336
PMCPMC11522253
OpenAlexW4395676846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.