Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38671248›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2024

Systematic evaluation of vertebral bone quality score as an opportunistic screening method for BMD in spine surgery patients.

Yunsheng Wang, Ning Song, Jiali Zhang, Jia Li, Ruoyu Li, Linfeng Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Comparative analysis of the correlation between paraspinal muscles fat infiltration and vertebral bone quality in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yunsheng Wang *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Qiaoxi District, 139 Ziqiang Road, Shijiazhuang, 050051, China.ORCID 0009-0008-7390-4613
Ning Song *Key Laboratory of Orthopedic Biomechanics of Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Jiali ZhangDepartment of Pharmacology, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Jia LiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Qiaoxi District, 139 Ziqiang Road, Shijiazhuang, 050051, China.
Ruoyu LiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Qiaoxi District, 139 Ziqiang Road, Shijiazhuang, 050051, China.
Linfeng WangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Qiaoxi District, 139 Ziqiang Road, Shijiazhuang, 050051, China. wanglinfenglaoshi@163.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0074-6043
Hebei Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to evaluate and compare the predictive value of vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score for low BMD and osteoporosis. Furthermore, we sought to enhance diagnostic effectiveness by integrating VBQ with easily accessible patient-specific factors.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed data from 180 patients. VBQ was obtained by preoperative MRI. Low BMD was classified as meeting the standards for either osteopenia or osteoporosis. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and multivariate logistic regression were used to detect the ability of variables to assess BMD. The z-test was used to compare the area under the curves of different variables.

resultsVBQ was more effective in identifying low BMD than osteoporosis (AUC, 0.768 vs. 0.613, p = 0.02). Elevated VBQ (OR 6.912, 95% CI 2.72-17.6) and low BMI (0.858, 0.76-0.97) were risk factors for low BMD, while the risk factor for osteoporosis was age (1.067, 1.02-1.12), not VBQ. ROC analysis showed that AUCs were 0.613 for VBQ and 0.665 for age when screening for osteoporosis. The combined variable of VBQ, sex, age, and BMI obtained by logistic regression significantly improved the efficacy of BMD screening, with an AUC of 0.824 for low BMD and 0.733 for osteoporosis.

conclusionVBQ is better at detecting low BMD than identifying osteoporosis. The ability of VBQ to predict osteoporosis is limited, and a similar diagnostic efficacy can be achieved with age. Incorporating VBQ alongside demographic data enhances the efficiency of BMD assessment. With the development of artificial intelligence in medicine, this simple method is promising.

Indexed as

Bone DensityOsteoporosisAdultAgedBone Diseases, MetabolicFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSpineBone mineral densityMagnetic resonance imagingOsteoporosisVertebral bone quality score

Identifiers

PMID38671248
OpenAlexW4395694231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.