ArticleNature protocols2024
Deep-time phylogenetic inference by paleoproteomic analysis of dental enamel.
Article in Nature protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Palaeoproteomic Deconvolution of Physical and Genetic Collagen Mixtures.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Ancient DNA as a temporal lens: reconstructing evolution, migration, and disease dynamics.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2026Review
- Beyond animal glue: Paleoproteomic analysis of paint binders and adhesives in ancient Egypt.Science advances · 2026Article
- Proteomic analysis of dental enamel from 20 Homo naledi individuals shows no male markers.Cell · 2026Article
- Assessing the Potential of Ancient Protein Sequences in the Study of Hominid Evolution.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- From Waste to Function: Valorization of Collagen-Based Wastes with Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents for Bioadhesive Applications.ACS sustainable chemistry & engineering · 2026Article
- The Japanese Archipelago sheltered cave lions, not tigers, during the Late Pleistocene.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Identification and removal of contamination in palaeoproteomic analysis of dental enamel.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Sex Identification and Species Confirmation in Modern and Archeological Caprine Enamel.Journal of proteome research · 2025Article
- Article
- Storage conditions differentially alter the human tooth enamel proteome.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2025Article
- The impact of cooking and burial on proteins: a characterisation of experimental foodcrusts and ceramics.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In temperate and subtropical regions, ancient proteins are reported to survive up to about 2 million years, far beyond the known limits of ancient DNA preservation in the same areas. Accordingly, their amino acid sequences currently represent the only source of genetic information available to pursue phylogenetic inference involving species that went extinct too long ago to be amenable for ancient DNA analysis. Here we present a complete workflow, including sample preparation, mass spectrometric data acquisition and computational analysis, to recover and interpret million-year-old dental enamel protein sequences. During sample preparation, the proteolytic digestion step, usually an integral part of conventional bottom-up proteomics, is omitted to increase the recovery of the randomly degraded peptides spontaneously generated by extensive diagenetic hydrolysis of ancient proteins over geological time. Similarly, we describe other solutions we have adopted to (1) authenticate the endogenous origin of the protein traces we identify, (2) detect and validate amino acid variation in the ancient protein sequences and (3) attempt phylogenetic inference. Sample preparation and data acquisition can be completed in 3-4 working days, while subsequent data analysis usually takes 2-5 days. The workflow described requires basic expertise in ancient biomolecules analysis, mass spectrometry-based proteomics and molecular phylogeny. Finally, we describe the limits of this approach and its potential for the reconstruction of evolutionary relationships in paleontology and paleoanthropology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.