Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38671180›Full record

ArticleAmbio2024

A dam or a polder? Stakeholders' dispute over the "right" flood-protection measure in the Czech Republic.

Ivan Andráško, Barbora Duží, Stanislav Martinát

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ivan AndráškoDepartment of Environmental Geography, Institute of Geonics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Drobného 28, 602 00, Brno, Czech Republic. ivan.andrasko@outlook.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4599-1296
Barbora DužíDepartment of Environmental Geography, Institute of Geonics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Drobného 28, 602 00, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4250-0196
Stanislav MartinátDepartment of Environmental Geography, Institute of Geonics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Drobného 28, 602 00, Brno, Czech Republic.

Funding

Grantová Agentura České Republiky 20-11782S
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study focuses on the Skalička Waterwork (SWW), a largely debated and media-covered water-related/flood-protection project in the Czech Republic. Relying primarily on stakeholder interviews, we traced back and reconstructed the project's development, including its key tipping points reflecting the changing societal preferences for particular measures, yet also the involvement of individual actors/stakeholders, and their differing views. The case eventually crystallized into the "dam versus polder" dispute; concerned by the repercussions for the local landscape, a joint initiative of NGOs, local activists, and politicians not only opposed the dam variant proposed by the state river basin administration but also succeeded in pushing through the alternative scheme of side dry polder. While in many ways specific (e.g. not entailing local resistance), the case exemplifies recent shifts (and respective struggles) within flood risk management, including the increasing importance attributed to complex, catchment-wide perspectives, joint local and scientific knowledge, participatory decision-making processes, or implementation of nature-based and hybrid solutions.

Indexed as

FloodsCzech RepublicDissent and DisputesHumansRisk ManagementRiversStakeholder ParticipationCzech RepublicDispute/conflictFlood-protection measuresInterviewsPolderStakeholder involvement

Identifiers

PMID38671180
PMCPMC11384668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.