Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38671022›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Understanding the impact of modiolus porosity on stimulation of spiral ganglion neurons by cochlear implants.

Kiran K Sriperumbudur, Revathi Appali, Anthony W Gummer, Ursula van Rienen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kiran K SriperumbudurInstitute of General Electrical Engineering, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany. kiran.sriperumbudur@uni-rostock.de.
Revathi AppaliInstitute of General Electrical Engineering, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Anthony W GummerDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. anthony.gummer@uni-tuebingen.de.
Ursula van RienenInstitute of General Electrical Engineering, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
University of Rostock · DEUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Science Foundation) AP 259/1-260482124Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Science Foundation) GRK 1505/2-55641801Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Science Foundation) SFB 1270/1-299150580
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Moderate-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss in humans is treatable by electrically stimulating the auditory nerve (AN) with a cochlear implant (CI). In the cochlea, the modiolus presents a porous bony interface between the CI electrode and the AN. New bone growth caused by the presence of the CI electrode or neural degeneration inflicted by ageing or otological diseases might change the effective porosity of the modiolus and, thereby, alter its electrical material properties. Using a volume conductor description of the cochlea, with the aid of a 'mapped conductivity' method and an ad-hoc 'regionally kinetic' equation system, we show that even a slight variation in modiolus porosity or pore distribution can disproportionately affect AN stimulation. Hence, because of porosity changes, an inconsistent CI performance might occur if neural degeneration or new bone growth progress after implantation. Appropriate electrical material properties in accordance with modiolar morphology and pathology should be considered in patient-specific studies. The present first-of-its-kind in-silico study advocates for contextual experimental studies to further explore the utility of modiolus porous morphology in optimising the CI outcome.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantsSpiral GanglionCochleaCochlear NerveElectric StimulationHearing Loss, SensorineuralHumansNeuronsPorosity

Identifiers

PMID38671022
PMCPMC11053021
OpenAlexW4395667367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.